In comp.os.linux.misc (e-mail address removed):
[ please dont bottom post]
See RFC1855 howto reply properly.
[..]
Indeed:
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1
lol I top post because that is the default for Google groups...
That doesn't make it an inch more the correct behavior.
I used a newsreader in the 90s, used to chew up space, add an extra
window, had to click on all these different groups to find stuff...
aweful
You don't use a newsreader to search articles, though you can
easily filter on thread with your own contributes and what ever
you like. Can you do this with google? My nntp reader marks
automatically threads with my own posts. No need to click on
anything at all, it doesn't have a GUI interface. ;-)
I hate to break it to you but using a newsreader is old fashioned.
LOL, you don't use a cordless screwdriver to get a nail into the
wall. But use the right tool for the environment. Just as nntp
reader were designed to work with nntp. You must be a windoze
user?
Can you type these two workds into your *newsreader*:
Can your interface to usenet do the following?
- Strip ">" from quoted empty lines with a single key stroke, it
occurred to me lately that many nntp reader quote those?
- Reformat longish lines with a single keystroke?
- Use a real editor but not some sucking http form?
- Allow for adjustable spell checking?
- Postpone articles on demand?
- Allow arbitrary things like piping some article to some
script/command/etc?
[..]
and can you click on the suggested link and in 0.05 seconds get the 46
articles across the entire usenet that reference java server faces
command link component?
That's what a search engine is about, *not* some nntp client!
Google does a good job for searching purposes, but obviously is
just a makeshift to write to usenet.
There are for sure quite a few reasons to use it, but to praise
it as superior to any serious nntp client is just a joke. ;-)