ruby 1.9.2, rubygems and gentoo linux

S

Stefano Crocco

Hello to everyone.

On Gentoo linux, I have installed both ruby 1.9.2 and ruby 1.8.7, both
installed using emerge (the Gentoo package manager). This setup contains a gem
executable (rubygems version 1.3.7) which uses ruby 1.8, called gem18 and one
which uses ruby 1.9, called gem19. Yesterday, I was surprised to find that
gem18 installs gems in /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems, while gem19 installs them
under /usr/lib/ruby/gems and started to investigate the reason for this.

After looking at the changelog of the Gentoo package, I discovered that Gentoo
packagers chose to make rubygems install gems under /usr/local so that user-
installed gems won't conflict with those installed by the package manager,
which still installs them in /usr/lib/ruby/gems.

According to the changelog, this should happen with both ruby 1.8 and 1.9. The
way they accomplished this was to provide a operating_system.rb file which is
installed in the site_ruby/rubygems/default directory for both ruby 1.8 and
ruby 1.9. This file redefines some methods in the Gem module so that they
return the customized installation paths (for example, Gem.default_dir is
changed to return "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1" rather than
"/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1").

Looking at the ruby and rubygems source code, it seems that providing this
operating_system.rb file is the correct way for packagers to customize the
installation paths used by rubygems, so I tried to understand why this didn't
work correctly with ruby 1.9.

After a bit of experimentation, I understood what was happening: apparently,
everytime ruby 1.9 is launched, it requires some files, including
operating_system.rb. According to the contents of $", the other files are:
encdb.so and transdb.so (besides a mysterious enumerator.so which is shown
without its full path and which doesn't seems to exist anywhere in the ruby
directory). So, the reason rubygems uses the wrong directory is that it is
loaded *after* operating_system.rb, and thus overwrites the methods defined
there, restoring the original ones.

After this discovery, I tried to understand why ruby loaded
operating_system.rb at startup. Playing a bit with the command line options, I
found out the file wasn't loaded if I used the --disable-gem switch. So,
calling

ruby19 --disable-gem /usr/bin/gem19 environment

produced the correct results. I tried looking at the ruby source code to see
what was the exact effect of calling --disable-gem, but I'm not skilled enough
in C to understand ruby initialization code. I also tried looking for
references to operating_system.rb in the source code (outside the rubygems
directory) but the only place I found it mentioned is in gem_prelude.rb which
isn't installed on my system.

With ruby 1.8, this issue doesn't happen because operating_system.rb isn't
loaded by ruby at startup, but only after other rubygems file, so the methods
it defines aren't overwritten.

After this long explaination (I'm sorry for this, but I wanted to make the
situation clear), here are my questions:
1. is there someone else using ruby 1.9.2 (or maybe even 1.9.1, I'm not sure
whether this issue also happened with ruby 1.9.1 or not) on Gentoo which can
reproduce this issue? If so, I'll post a bug on the gentoo bugtraker (please,
if you're using gentoo and ruby 1.9.2 and not seeing this problem, do tell me,
so I'll know the problem I'm facing is related to my system's configuration)
2. does anyone know (or has any clue on) why ruby loads certain files at
startup?

Thanks in advance

Stefano
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,580
Members
45,054
Latest member
TrimKetoBoost

Latest Threads

Top