SOP for expected Timeout?

[Erwin Moller]

Jorge schreef:

Not me. What annoys me are the posts along the lines of yours.

Fine, you are completely entitled to your own opinion.

When/if you have nothing to say, don't say anything (i.e. don't post),
thanks.

So you decided to post a reply 4 days after the last message?

Jorge, why don't you live by your own rule: "When/if you have nothing to
say, don't say anything" ??

If I think Kenny is posting nonsense, or spamming in here, I will tell
him that, excactly like I did, regardless your opinion on the matter.
thanks.

Regards,
Erwin Moller



--
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
-- C.A.R. Hoare

 

[Kenny]

Jorge schreef:



Fine, you are completely entitled to your own opinion.



So you decided to post a reply 4 days after the last message?

Jorge, why don't you live by your own rule: "When/if you have nothing to
say, don't say anything" ??

If I think Kenny is posting nonsense, or spamming in here, I will tell
him that, excactly like I did, regardless your opinion on the matter.
thanks.

It all just gets so self-referential, doesn't it?

Why don't we just wait until I announce JCells*? Assuming of course my
nay-sayers are not intellectually honest enough to Just Read This:

http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cells/cells-manifesto.txt?root=cells&view=markup

....to decide whether I know anything about dataflow/FRP.

Meanwhile, I have not been fired (yet) and the client wants five new
screens so (a) I am glad I am using an application framework instead of
writing html/css and (b) it is not clear to me how a working JS
programmer writing about a JS framework in a JS newsgroup is either
nonsense or spamming or trolling.

p,k

* I am wading through the OO section of http://eloquentjavascript.net/.
Awesome. I had been looking in vain for something like that since JCells
is all about extending object models. Very well written, a rare thing in
technical writing.

 

[David Mark]

[snip]

* I am wading through the OO section ofhttp://eloquentjavascript.net/.

Didn't look at that section, but if it is anything like the DOM and
events sections, it should be avoided.

From the event section:

function normaliseEvent(event) {
if (!event.stopPropagation) {
event.stopPropagation = function() {this.cancelBubble = true;};
event.preventDefault = function() {this.returnValue = false;};
}

[snip]

 

[Kenny]

[snip]

* I am wading through the OO section ofhttp://eloquentjavascript.net/.

Didn't look at that section, but if it is anything like the DOM and
events sections, it should be avoided.

I'll know by the time I finish JCells if he got it wrong. But then I
would probably just send in corrections to make his book even better.

From the event section:

function normaliseEvent(event) {
if (!event.stopPropagation) {
event.stopPropagation = function() {this.cancelBubble = true;};
event.preventDefault = function() {this.returnValue = false;};
}

[snip]

You should write a "black belt" book. Or start a Web page, sell some
ads. But ya gots to go MIT on the license if you really want to rule the
world.

p,k

 

[David Mark]

[snip]

* I am wading through the OO section ofhttp://eloquentjavascript.net/.

Didn't look at that section, but if it is anything like the DOM and
events sections, it should be avoided.

I'll know by the time I finish JCells if he got it wrong. But then I
Whatever.

would probably just send in corrections to make his book even better.

Good for you.

From the event section:

function normaliseEvent(event) {
  if (!event.stopPropagation) {
    event.stopPropagation = function() {this.cancelBubble = true;};
    event.preventDefault = function() {this.returnValue = false;};
  }

[snip]

You should write a "black belt" book. Or start a Web page, sell some

A "black belt" book? I don't know what that means. And I have a Web
page. Thank you.

[snip]

 

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

You should write a "black belt" book. [...]

A "black belt" book? I don't know what that means.

A black belt represents the lower master's ranks (Dan) in several Japanese,
Korean, and Chinese martial arts.


HTH

PointedEars

 

[Erwin Moller]

Kenny schreef:

It all just gets so self-referential, doesn't it?

It sure does.

But I love Douglas Hofstadter's work, so I don't mind a little
self-referencing. ;-)
Did you by any chance read any of his books?
I loved "The mind's I".
Right now I am halfway "I am a Strange loop", but I am stuck trying to
understand Godel's Incompleteness proof, and I refuse to read any futher
untill I 'got it'.

Why don't we just wait until I announce JCells*?

It is not the JCells I had a problem with, it is the announcing. ;-)

Peace.

Regards,
Erwin Moller


--
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
-- C.A.R. Hoare