Why Perl 5.10.0 is still considered stable?

Discussion in 'Perl Misc' started by howa, Mar 7, 2009.

  1. howa

    howa Guest

    howa, Mar 7, 2009
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. howa

    Tim Greer Guest

    Tim Greer, Mar 8, 2009
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. howa

    howa Guest

    Hi,


    Are you sure this file is 5.10.0.17?

    http://www.cpan.org/src/perl-5.10.0.tar.gz
     
    howa, Mar 8, 2009
    #3
  4. howa

    smallpond Guest

    I don't use Debian, but Fedora's latest build was Feb 16, 2009
    using their release number 5.10.0-56 and still has the leak.
    I didn't see it in the Fedora bugzilla database so I added it.
     
    smallpond, Mar 8, 2009
    #4
  5. howa

    Tim Greer Guest

    I'm actually on CentOS. I had just meant to say that 0.17 is supposed
    to be when it was patched. I gather it wasn't then. Interesting.
     
    Tim Greer, Mar 8, 2009
    #5
  6. I was wondering what perl 5.10.0.17 was supposed to be (there was no
    formal release since 5.10.0, much less 17 of them), until I noticed that
    the link above mentions perl-5.10.0-17 (i.e., release 17 of the Debian
    package of perl 5.10.0).

    The latest official release of perl is still 5.10.0. I don't know when
    5.10.1 will be ready, although chromatic mentioned about a month ago[1]
    that it is "on the way" (those following the p5p list may know more).

    Debian and Fedora are independent distributions. They may or may not
    apply fixes from bleadperl to their packages.

    hp


    [1] http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2009/01/why-perl-510-is-modern-and-perl-589-is-legacy.html
     
    Peter J. Holzer, Mar 8, 2009
    #6
  7. howa

    Tim Greer Guest

    Yes, definitely. I don't use either of those dists and I'd not expect
    them to have the same release builds in their Perl packages. I just
    saw a report that the bug was fixed for Debian in the 0.17 "package"
    build.
     
    Tim Greer, Mar 9, 2009
    #7
  8. howa

    smallpond Guest

    Fedora team has already rolled out the fix for F9 and F10.
    That's quick work. I guess Debian isn't as enthusiastic.
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489204
     
    smallpond, Mar 23, 2009
    #8
  9. Why do you guess that? According to to URL quoted above the bug was
    fixed in 5.10.0-17. The version in Lenny is 5.10.0-19. So it is already
    fixed.

    hp
     
    Peter J. Holzer, Mar 23, 2009
    #9
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.