Best "Best when viewed" statement

[Joy Beeson]

I laughed out loud, but you won't because I've spoiled the surprise:

http://notableknotindex.webs.com/knotindex.html


--
Joy Beeson
joy beeson at comcast dot net
http://roughsewing.home.comcast.net/
The above message is a Usenet post.
I don't recall having given anyone permission to use it on a Web site.

 

[dorayme]

I laughed out loud, but you won't because I've spoiled the surprise:

http://notableknotindex.webs.com/knotindex.html

Presumably you laughed at the markup and styling, but the last
thing on the mind of the person doing this page was good markup,
so don't be too hard on him or her.

 

[PStechPaul]

"dorayme" wrote in message

Presumably you laughed at the markup and styling, but the
last thing on the mind of the person doing this page was
good markup, so don't be too hard on him or her.

It was a good example of how "knot" to do it. But in comparison to other
similar sites, they would end up in a "tie".

Perhaps instead of being notable, it is not able.

I wonder if it is better viewed with Manila, Sisal, or Hemp?
http://www.thomasnet.com/products/cordage-hemp-jute-manila-sisal-19870609-1.html



Paul

 

[Lewis]

Presumably you laughed at the markup and styling, but the last
thing on the mind of the person doing this page was good markup,
so don't be too hard on him or her.

I don't think so.

The site is about knots, and states "this site is best viewed with a
rope."

 

[dorayme]

I don't think so.

I am sure everyone would agree with you on this. <g>

 

[Tim Streater]

I don't think so.

The site is about knots, and states "this site is best viewed with a
rope."

Err, whoosh! it seems to me.