F
R
rf
F F said:
What's happy about it. Didn't some poor blighter get nailed up?
Besides, you're a week and a half early.
T
Travis Newbury
Nice flexible design...
R
rf
Travis Newbury said:
<looks/>
Indeed.
Pity about the validation
M
mrcakey
F F said:
Good Godfrey Evans! That may be just about the ugliest site I've EVER
seen - anyone got any other contenders?
+mrcakey
M
mrcakey
F F said:
P.S. - Happy Easter to you too - for next week.
+mrcakey
J
Jonathan N. Little
Blinky said:
Love his contingency plan for if his sites is hacked!
B
Bergamot
Blinky said:
"Danger EYE and MIND CANDY Below"
I first came upon this one several years ago - good to see the classics
are still stylish.
B
Blinky the Shark
mrcakey said:
Not even close.
Check out:http://www.rogerart.com/
This one is a huge download; wait for it if you're on a slow connection;
it's worth it:
http://www.arngren.net/
J
Jonathan N. Little
Blinky said:
Well, he has a stutter "big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big>"
B
Blinky the Shark
Bergamot said:"Danger EYE and MIND CANDY Below"
I first came upon this one several years ago - good to see the classics
are still stylish.
Here's another, but it you may not see what I'm seeing (in FF).
http://www.spoonsandthings.com/SPOONS.htm
Here, the title
Spoons &
Things
is about 1600 pixels wide on my 1920px-wide display.
Beneath that HUUUUGE text, the text renders normally.
Oh, hell......here's a screencap.
Remember, that's almost 2000px wide.http://blinkynet.net/stuff/comp/giantspoons.jpg
P
Phil Kempster
mrcakey said:
http://www.pc-mobile.net/index.htm
He's got some good gear, pity about the site design!
PhilK
N
Neredbojias
Whaddya mean? That page is "kewl", man!
All right, this one's a little fu'ed. Excessive horz scrollbar, et al.
But at least I wasn't bored in the first 5 seconds.
B
Blinky the Shark
Neredbojias said:
That's it? The ads aren't frequently overlapping each other? It looks
like a grocery store bulleting board, here, with notes pinned up about
three deep on top of each other.
B
Blinky the Shark
Phil said:
It's a little less awful in lynx.
C
Chris F.A. Johnson
On 2008-03-12, Blinky the Shark wrote:
....
<meta name="generator" content="Created Using Yahoo! PageBuilder 2.61.90">
Typical for PageBuilder and SiteBuilder.
Is it possible that there are circumstances under which the page
actually works?
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/www.arngren.net.jpg>
....
<meta name="generator" content="Created Using Yahoo! PageBuilder 2.61.90">
Typical for PageBuilder and SiteBuilder.
Is it possible that there are circumstances under which the page
actually works?
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/www.arngren.net.jpg>
J
John Hosking
Blinky said:
Not that bad in my FF, but not exactly up for a Webby, either.
I made a wild guess that the site was made with overuse of
position:absolute, but when I used the Web Developer extension to View
CSS, there wasn't any.
Turns out all the styling, every last, ill-conceived, non-valid bit of
it, is all done using inline styles.
ROFL and P
Apropos ugly sites: I seem to remember a long, long page (on a green
BG?) from some paranoid loony type of fellow from, I think, somewhere in
the UK. I'm trying to remember some detail of his page or paranoia (it
wasn't the MI5 guy). Guns? Aliens? Oil companies and huge conglomerates?
Parakeets? Don't remember...
B
Blinky the Shark
John said:
Look at the screen capture Chris F.A. Johnson just linked to:
http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/www.arngren.net.jpg
B
Blinky the Shark
Chris said:
I'm grabbing that screen cap, for next time. Thanks. And I'm glad
it's horrible for someone here besides me.
I'll be making it smaller so dialup users don't have a 2-minute wait.
N
Neredbojias
Well 'course, and therein lies much of its charisma. Visual art can take
on unusual and unexpected forms. Perhaps the technique is, uh, too subtle
for your tastes.