Issue with Pre-Redmond Mailing

Discussion in 'C++' started by David Abrahams, Sep 19, 2004.

  1. The committee's Pre-Redmond mailing is out; you can peruse the papers
    at http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004. For
    anyone interested in N1691, "Explicit Namespaces", an administrative
    SNAFU seems to have mangled it. A pristine version is available at
    http://www.boost-consulting.com/writing/n1691.html

    Cheers,
    --
    Dave Abrahams
    Boost Consulting
    http://www.boost-consulting.com

    [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
    [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]

    [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
    [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto: ]
    [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
    [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
     
    David Abrahams, Sep 19, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. David Abrahams wrote:
    >
    > The committee's Pre-Redmond mailing is out; you can peruse the papers
    > at http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004. For
    > anyone interested in N1691, "Explicit Namespaces", an administrative
    > SNAFU seems to have mangled it. A pristine version is available at
    > http://www.boost-consulting.com/writing/n1691.html



    The long long issue, although in C99 and C++/CLI current draft, I think
    it must become long64 or int64.



    --
    Ioannis Vranos

    http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys


    [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
    [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]

    [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
    [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto: ]
    [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
    [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
     
    Ioannis Vranos, Sep 21, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. David Abrahams

    Stephen Lamb Guest

    "David Abrahams" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    >
    > The committee's Pre-Redmond mailing is out; you can peruse the papers
    > at http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004. For
    > anyone interested in N1691, "Explicit Namespaces", an administrative
    > SNAFU seems to have mangled it. A pristine version is available at
    > http://www.boost-consulting.com/writing/n1691.html


    I'm not sure if you meant to leave off the return type in the declaration of
    tie in example 2. This shows up in both places mentioned above.

    // Connect p2 to the output of p1
    tie(pipe const& p1, pipe& p2);

    Did you mean?

    // Connect p2 to the output of p1
    void tie(pipe const& p1, pipe& p2);


    Not that this matters a whole lot to your points.





    [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
    [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]

    [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles, try just posting with ]
    [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto: ]
    [ --- Please see the FAQ before posting. --- ]
    [ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html ]
     
    Stephen Lamb, Sep 25, 2004
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Rocky Moore
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    1,748
    mikeb
    Jan 14, 2004
  2. marss
    Replies:
    25
    Views:
    707
    murrayatuptowngallery
    Jul 19, 2007
  3. marss
    Replies:
    25
    Views:
    868
    murrayatuptowngallery
    Jul 19, 2007
  4. Keld Jørn Simonsen

    Pre Santa Barbara mailing available

    Keld Jørn Simonsen, Aug 14, 2008, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    12
    Views:
    591
  5. K.P Kumar
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    384
    red floyd
    Jun 29, 2009
Loading...

Share This Page