R
reader
Lord Headley Al-Farooq (England)
Peer, Statesman, and Author
About the Author:
Lord Headley al-Farooq (Rt. Hon. Sir Rowland George Allanson) was born
in 1855 A.D. and was a leading British peer, statesman and author.
Educated in Cambridge, he became a peer in 1877, served in the army as
a captain and later on as Lieut. Colonel in 4th Battalion of North
Minister Fusiliers. Although an engineer by profession he had wide
literary tastes. One time he was the editor of the "Salisbury
Journal". He was also the author of several books, most well known
amongst them being: A Western Awakening to Islam. Lord Headley
embraced Islam on 16th November 1913(8) and adopted the Muslim name of
Shaikh Rahmatullah al-Farooq. The Lord was a widely travelled man and
he visited India in 1928.
It is possible some of my friends may imagine that I have been
influenced by Muslims; but this is not the cause, for my present
convictions are solely the outcome of many years of thought. My actual
conversations with educated Muslims on the subject of religion only
commenced a few weeks ago, and need I say that I am overjoyed to find
that all my theories and conclusions are entirely in accord with
Islam.
Conversion, according to the Koran, should come out of free choice and
spontaneous judgement, and never be attained by means of compulsion.
Jesus meant the same thing when he said to his disciples: "And
whosoever shall not receive you nor hear you, when ye depart there ...
(St. Mark, vi, 2).
I have known very many instances of zealous Protestants who have
thought it their duty to visit Roman Catholic homes in order to make
'converts' of the inmates. Such irritating and unneighbourly conduct
is, of course, very obnoxious, and has invariably led to much ill-
feeling -- stirring up strife and tending to bring religion into
contempt. I am sorry to think that Christian missionaries have also
tried these methods with their Muslim brethren; though, I am at a loss
to conceive, why should they try to convert those who are already
better Christians than they are themselves? I say 'better Christians'
advisedly, because charity, tolerance and broad-mindedness in the
Muslim faith come nearer to what Christ himself taught than do the
somewhat narrow tenets of the various Christian Churches.
To take one example: the Athnasian Creed, which treats the Trinity in
a very confusing manner. In this Creed, which is very important and
deals conclusively with one of the fundamental tenets of the
'Churches', it is laid down most clearly that it represents the
Catholic faith, and that if we do not believe it we shall perish
everlastingly. Then we are told that we must think of the Trinity if
we want to be saved - in other words that the idea is of a God whom we
in one breath hail as merciful and almighty and in the very next
breath whom we accuse of injustice and cruelty, qualities which we
would attribute to the most blood-thirsty human tyrant. As if God, Who
is before all and above all, would be in any way influenced by what a
poor mortal 'thinks of the Trinity'.
Here is another instance of want of charity. I received a letter -- it
was of my leaning towards Islam -- in which the writer told me that if
I did not believe in the Divinity of Christ I could not be saved. The
question of the Divinity of Christ never seemed to me nearly so
important as that other question: 'Did he give God's message to
mankind?' Now if I had any doubt this latter point it would worry me a
great deal, but thank God, I have no doubts, and I hope that my faith
in Christ and his inspired teachings is as firm as that of any other
Muslim or Christian. As I have often said before, Islam and
Christianity, as taught by Christ himself, are sister religions, only
held apart by dogmas and technicalities which might very well be
dispensed with.
In the present day men are prone to become atheists when asked to
subscribe to dogmatic and intolerant beliefs, and there is doubtless a
craving for a religion appealing to the intelligence as well as to the
sentiments of men. Whoever heard of a Muslim turning atheist? There
may have been some cases, but I very much doubt it.
There are thousands of men -- and women, too, I believe -- who are at
heart Muslims, but convention, fear of adverse comments, and desire to
avoid any worry or change, conspire to keep them from openly admitting
the fact. I have taken the step, though I am quite aware that many
friends and relatives now look upon me as a lost soul and past praying
for. And yet I am just the same in my beliefs as I was twenty years
ago; it is the outspoken utterance which has lost me their good
opinion.
Having briefly given some of the reasons for adopting the teachings of
Islam, and having explained that I consider myself by that very act a
far better Christian than I was before, I can only hope that others
will follow the example -- which I honestly believe is a good one --
which will bring happiness to any one looking upon the step as one in
advance rather than one in any way hostile to true Christianity.
From "Islam, Our Choice" compiled and edited by Ebrahim Ahmed Bawany,
1961.
Peer, Statesman, and Author
About the Author:
Lord Headley al-Farooq (Rt. Hon. Sir Rowland George Allanson) was born
in 1855 A.D. and was a leading British peer, statesman and author.
Educated in Cambridge, he became a peer in 1877, served in the army as
a captain and later on as Lieut. Colonel in 4th Battalion of North
Minister Fusiliers. Although an engineer by profession he had wide
literary tastes. One time he was the editor of the "Salisbury
Journal". He was also the author of several books, most well known
amongst them being: A Western Awakening to Islam. Lord Headley
embraced Islam on 16th November 1913(8) and adopted the Muslim name of
Shaikh Rahmatullah al-Farooq. The Lord was a widely travelled man and
he visited India in 1928.
It is possible some of my friends may imagine that I have been
influenced by Muslims; but this is not the cause, for my present
convictions are solely the outcome of many years of thought. My actual
conversations with educated Muslims on the subject of religion only
commenced a few weeks ago, and need I say that I am overjoyed to find
that all my theories and conclusions are entirely in accord with
Islam.
Conversion, according to the Koran, should come out of free choice and
spontaneous judgement, and never be attained by means of compulsion.
Jesus meant the same thing when he said to his disciples: "And
whosoever shall not receive you nor hear you, when ye depart there ...
(St. Mark, vi, 2).
I have known very many instances of zealous Protestants who have
thought it their duty to visit Roman Catholic homes in order to make
'converts' of the inmates. Such irritating and unneighbourly conduct
is, of course, very obnoxious, and has invariably led to much ill-
feeling -- stirring up strife and tending to bring religion into
contempt. I am sorry to think that Christian missionaries have also
tried these methods with their Muslim brethren; though, I am at a loss
to conceive, why should they try to convert those who are already
better Christians than they are themselves? I say 'better Christians'
advisedly, because charity, tolerance and broad-mindedness in the
Muslim faith come nearer to what Christ himself taught than do the
somewhat narrow tenets of the various Christian Churches.
To take one example: the Athnasian Creed, which treats the Trinity in
a very confusing manner. In this Creed, which is very important and
deals conclusively with one of the fundamental tenets of the
'Churches', it is laid down most clearly that it represents the
Catholic faith, and that if we do not believe it we shall perish
everlastingly. Then we are told that we must think of the Trinity if
we want to be saved - in other words that the idea is of a God whom we
in one breath hail as merciful and almighty and in the very next
breath whom we accuse of injustice and cruelty, qualities which we
would attribute to the most blood-thirsty human tyrant. As if God, Who
is before all and above all, would be in any way influenced by what a
poor mortal 'thinks of the Trinity'.
Here is another instance of want of charity. I received a letter -- it
was of my leaning towards Islam -- in which the writer told me that if
I did not believe in the Divinity of Christ I could not be saved. The
question of the Divinity of Christ never seemed to me nearly so
important as that other question: 'Did he give God's message to
mankind?' Now if I had any doubt this latter point it would worry me a
great deal, but thank God, I have no doubts, and I hope that my faith
in Christ and his inspired teachings is as firm as that of any other
Muslim or Christian. As I have often said before, Islam and
Christianity, as taught by Christ himself, are sister religions, only
held apart by dogmas and technicalities which might very well be
dispensed with.
In the present day men are prone to become atheists when asked to
subscribe to dogmatic and intolerant beliefs, and there is doubtless a
craving for a religion appealing to the intelligence as well as to the
sentiments of men. Whoever heard of a Muslim turning atheist? There
may have been some cases, but I very much doubt it.
There are thousands of men -- and women, too, I believe -- who are at
heart Muslims, but convention, fear of adverse comments, and desire to
avoid any worry or change, conspire to keep them from openly admitting
the fact. I have taken the step, though I am quite aware that many
friends and relatives now look upon me as a lost soul and past praying
for. And yet I am just the same in my beliefs as I was twenty years
ago; it is the outspoken utterance which has lost me their good
opinion.
Having briefly given some of the reasons for adopting the teachings of
Islam, and having explained that I consider myself by that very act a
far better Christian than I was before, I can only hope that others
will follow the example -- which I honestly believe is a good one --
which will bring happiness to any one looking upon the step as one in
advance rather than one in any way hostile to true Christianity.
From "Islam, Our Choice" compiled and edited by Ebrahim Ahmed Bawany,
1961.