B
barnesc
So mixins are just a sub-class [pun intended] of sub-classing?
I've just found this:
A mixin class is a parent class that is inherited from - but not as
a means of specialization. Typically, the mixin will export services to a
child class, but no semantics will be implied about the child "being a
kind of" the parent.
[end quote]
from http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MixIn
Is that all they are?
It is amazing how you can take the simplest concept, and by using
appropriate terminology, make it as confusing and opaque as you want...
*wink*
"A mixin is an atomic unit in an object-oriented language that adds
functionality to another class."
- http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flex/1/mixin/
mixin2.html#118542
The only experience I've had with mixins is in Python, where
UserDict has a class DictMixin that defines the full dictionary
interface from a minimal subset of dictionary methods.
The Python docs don't define mixin. I just assumed this was a case
where a programmer needed a name more descriptive than foo, so he
called it mixin, and that stuck.
- Connelly Barnes