Python Standardization: Wikipedia entry

P

Paul Boddie

ANSI standards are owned by ANSI or perhaps the accrediting body. In any
case, electronic copies sell for $30. They cannot legally be accessed free
as for the docs at python.org.

Yes, you don't really want standardisation ANSI/ISO-style as the
standards themselves are not freely distributable, although some
people have kindly made drafts of various standards available in
various places, probably against the licensing conditions. Other
standards barely deserve the title because, despite there being some
kind of consensus about their content, they are administered by
industry groups who won't let you look without you either paying to
join their club or accepting a bunch of conditions: not redistributing
material from the texts is probably the mildest I can think of; I'd
imagine that they'd probably have the other members hit you up for
patent licences.

Ultimately, this leaves the W3C as the only genuinely open formal
standards body that I can think of immediately, but I think Python is
somewhat peripheral for them, despite extensive usage of Python by
various W3C people.

Paul
 
P

Paddy

Ultimately, this leaves the W3C as the only genuinely open formal
standards body that I can think of immediately, but I think Python is
somewhat peripheral for them, despite extensive usage of Python by
various W3C people.

Paul

W3C got me thinking of Javascript/ECMAscript.
Isn't ECMA a standards body?

- Paddy.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,774
Messages
2,569,596
Members
45,141
Latest member
BlissKeto
Top