--nextPart1237130.6OJJY92a2J
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
quoth the Robert Dober:
I just do not like these kind of ratings, I believe that they are
manipulatory, defending the interest of certain persons/lobbies and are
often very biased.
Am I wrong on this one?
Well, I don't know about the rankings being controlled by anyones interests=
,=20
this page:
http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
states the rankings are based on search engine hits, which I really don't=20
think is a useful metric for anything but anecdotal evidence. The=20
whole 'status' ranking however does seem somewhat arbitrary, even after=20
reading the description of it.
=20
I would appreciate any point of view.
On one hand the site claims to define the ranking on available knowledge
acceptance etc. OTH it does not give any definition of cretira and uses
terms like Status that do not seem to be defined anywhere.
Enough to make a notorious pessimist very, very sceptic about it.
Yeah, I wouldn't put too much stock in it...about as useful as a googlefigh=
t!
=2Dd
=2D-=20
darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 ::
http://badcomputer.org
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..."
=2D Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972
--nextPart1237130.6OJJY92a2J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBE3xYswPD5Cr/3CJgRAoSGAKCNjTsHZo605cMatERydlikoAMVaQCg8nuW
vOfynXiyM1App676T4/2VZ8=
=DSyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1237130.6OJJY92a2J--