Stupid eclipse/android question

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

I enter a debugging session, but I don't know how to get out of it.
The only options I can see are suspend and resume???

 

[Stefan Ram]

I enter a debugging session, but I don't know how to get out of it.
The only options I can see are suspend and resume???

Do you want to change the perspective back from the
debug perspective to the Java perspective?

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

Do you want to change the perspective back from the
debug perspective to the Java perspective?

I want to get out of debug and just run the program again.
The only way I can do that at present is to kill the emulator and do a
new build. Changing perspectives is not a problem.

 

[Stefan Ram]

I want to get out of debug and just run the program again.
The only way I can do that at present is to kill the emulator and do a
new build. Changing perspectives is not a problem.

IIRC, Eclipse has a button with a red square to stop a process.

http://www.my28msec.com/images/support/get_started_eclipse/run_project8.png

The red button in the debug perspective:

http://musarra.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kettledummyplugineclipsedebug_b.png

 

[Screamin Lord Byron]

IIRC, Eclipse has a button with a red square to stop a process.

http://www.my28msec.com/images/support/get_started_eclipse/run_project8.png

The red button in the debug perspective:

http://musarra.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kettledummyplugineclipsedebug_b.png

But be sure to first choose "ApplicationName [Android Application]" item
in the debug window. If you choose anything else, the red button will be
disabled.

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

IIRC, Eclipse has a button with a red square to stop a process.

http://www.my28msec.com/images/support/get_started_eclipse/run_project8.png

The red button in the debug perspective:

http://musarra.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kettledummyplugineclipsedebug_b.png

But be sure to first choose "ApplicationName [Android Application]" item
in the debug window. If you choose anything else, the red button will be
disabled.

Thanks all.
I've got a red zigzag saying "Disconnect" that seems to work

 

[Daniele Futtorovic]

I want to get out of debug and just run the program again.
The only way I can do that at present is to kill the emulator and do a
new build. Changing perspectives is not a problem.

IIRC, Eclipse has a button with a red square to stop a process.

http://www.my28msec.com/images/support/get_started_eclipse/run_project8.png


The red button in the debug perspective:

http://musarra.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kettledummyplugineclipsedebug_b.png

But be sure to first choose "ApplicationName [Android Application]" item
in the debug window. If you choose anything else, the red button will be
disabled.

Thanks all.
I've got a red zigzag saying "Disconnect" that seems to work

Please don't tell me you pressed the red button.

Oh shi-

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

On 28.02.2011 20:05, Stefan Ram wrote:
I want to get out of debug and just run the program again.
The only way I can do that at present is to kill the emulator and do a
new build. Changing perspectives is not a problem.

IIRC, Eclipse has a button with a red square to stop a process.

http://www.my28msec.com/images/support/get_started_eclipse/run_project8.png



The red button in the debug perspective:

http://musarra.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/kettledummyplugineclipsedebug_b.png



But be sure to first choose "ApplicationName [Android Application]" item
in the debug window. If you choose anything else, the red button will be
disabled.

Thanks all.
I've got a red zigzag saying "Disconnect" that seems to work

Please don't tell me you pressed the red button.

Oh shi-

The one that said "Do Not Press"?
Er... no.
Of course not.

 

[Stefan Ram]

The one that said "Do Not Press"?

»You acknowledge that Licensed Software is not designed
or intended for use in the design, construction,
operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility.«

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/j2re-1_4_2_02-license.html

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

»You acknowledge that Licensed Software is not designed
or intended for use in the design, construction,
operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility.«

http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/j2re-1_4_2_02-license.html

Shit.
Back to Basic for my home nuke then.

 

[Lew]

Shit.
Back to Basic for my home nuke then.

Seriously, you're citing the Java 1.4 license? Who uses Java 1.4?

Java 6 has the same restriction if you use Oracle's version.

The question is harder to answer for OpenJDK. The Sun binary license
for OpenJDK has the no-nukes clause but the GPL does not. The binary
license does not mention Oracle.

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

Seriously, you're citing the Java 1.4 license? Who uses Java 1.4?

Java 6 has the same restriction if you use Oracle's version.

The question is harder to answer for OpenJDK. The Sun binary license
for OpenJDK has the no-nukes clause but the GPL does not. The binary
license does not mention Oracle.

I once used 1.1.6

 

[Lew]

Don't quote sigs.

I once used 1.1.6

I once used FORTRAN IV. So?

 

[Dirk Bruere at NeoPax]

Don't quote sigs.

My sig is worth quoting

I once used FORTRAN IV. So?

So, a bit of a step down for you then, after Fortran...

 

[Tom Anderson]

Java 6 has the same restriction if you use Oracle's version.

The question is harder to answer for OpenJDK. The Sun binary license
for OpenJDK has the no-nukes clause but the GPL does not.

No, but if you do use it to build nukes, you have to give them to
everybody.

tom

 

[Lew]

No, but if you do use it to build nukes, you have to give them to everybody.

Not really. You just have to give the source code with them and let them
modify it. There's nothing in the GPL that forces you to give your nukes, and
thus your source code, to anyone, or to do so free of charge.

For those who might wonder, by the casual term "nuke" I mean nuclear power
plant, of course.

Although - the wording is tricky. They say "nuclear facility". That could
include cancer treatment centers, X-ray device factories, particle
accelerators, science laboratories, uranium mines, and Acme Cloud Chamber Co.

But wait - isn't all matter ultimately nuclear - I mean, just because no one
has a good TOE doesn't mean there is no unifying principle. That would mean
absolutely everything is a nuclear facility and Java isn't good for anything.

Certainly the modern computer, using FETs and the like, is itself a nuclear
facility, so it's clear that whatever else you might say, Java is not intended
for use in Java development.

 

[Arne Vajhøj]

Seriously, you're citing the Java 1.4 license? Who uses Java 1.4?

Java 6 has the same restriction if you use Oracle's version.

The question is harder to answer for OpenJDK. The Sun binary license
for OpenJDK has the no-nukes clause but the GPL does not. The binary
license does not mention Oracle.

I don't think they can have the clause for OpenJDK.

From the definition of open source:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd

"The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in
a specific field of endeavor."

I think that makes an exclude for nuclear-power-plants incompatible.

Arne