R
rf
'Course, if I ever get down around Sydney-way, I'll wash
your mouth out with soap - and enjoy doing it, he he!
Jpegs will be required. Might even pop over the river and watch
'Course, if I ever get down around Sydney-way, I'll wash
your mouth out with soap - and enjoy doing it, he he!
Advertising loading delay with "loading..." isn't very good. However,
if you are suggesting that bandwidth is not a factor, I don't agree.
Everything must load eventually.
A good developer may disguise the
loading, he may optimize the file size, but he can't accelerate it.
I can't disagree with your logic, but I wonder about your metrics. How
do you measure how many were driven away?
Enjoyed may have been a poor choice of words on my part, taste is
subjective. However, I'm pretty sure if someone can't view my site, the
chances that they will like it are greatly reduced.
Flash
is discussed, everyone rushes to say the bleeding obvious? If
someone else says that Flash is good when it is done right and
where it is appropriate again, I am going to scream and you will
hear me over the Pacific Ocean. Why is not everyone else
screaming too? What is going on?
Perhaps he's a Trekky attuned to the Vulcan mystique.
Average is good. The trouble is one can't get fanatical over it without
loosing that very characteristic.
One day we'll all be as close to God as we can get. It may not be
permanent, but I intend to use whatever time I have to tell Him just
exactly how badly he screwed up down here, so don't worry.
I have not got skin. I am always far more naked than even your
lurid imagination could cope with.
Jpegs will be required. Might even pop over the river and watch
No, but did anyone else think that 7-of-9 was REALLY hot when she had
the Borg makeup on?
Average is good? Come on Nerebojias. That has such a socialistic
ring to it. KIDS Grow up to be AVERAGE!!!
Neredbojias said:Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:31:40
GMT
rf scribed:
'kay, but I doubt that dorayme will be so inclined to pose for you. What
should I use, dish-liquid, detergent, or grandma's famous big-bar lye
soap?
I think I'll go with grandma's 'cause she is a repeat-offender.
Neredbojias said:Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:20:21 GMT
Travis Newbury scribed:
Yeah, and I had a picture of whoever-it-is (jpeg), -probably a promo from a
movie or something, where she looked even better. Unfortunately, the crash
got it.
I admit my flash/actionscript skills are limited. I am sure they don'tthat causes you to disagree. What I am saying is that a good Flash
developer can make a site filed with Flash that is no heavier than the
same site with HTML and images. The Flash you are use to seeing is
fat and bloated.
I once worked with one of those "artists" who insisted on resizing the... Bad Flash is. The problem comes from
Flash was originally used my artists, ...
I wonder how you and I can be in so much agreement and yet this threadGoogle's product is words, and its visitors are looking for words. It
would be dumb for them to use Flash for anything that produces those
words. The Warcraft site is visual, about a game, its visitors are
looking for fun and action. You can't do that with words (at lease
not to todays kids). A site developer has to do a little research
before they can make any decision about the technologies they will use
on their site, and how they will use them. Blanket rules don't work.
Every site must cater to its customers or the customers will go to
another site that does cater to them. So using flash just because you
can is dumb. Using Flash because it make your site better to those
that will actually use your site is smart. And the exact opposite is
true too. NOT using Flash when that is what your customers are
demanding is equally as dumb.
I admit my flash/actionscript skills are limited. I am sure they don't
match yours or your definition of a good developer, they are however
better than some "professionals" I have worked "with" mostly because
they took the "flash for flash sake" approach you appropriately disdain.
I once worked with one of those "artists" who insisted on resizing the
viewer's browser window to "maintain the proper aspect ratio." Never
mind the slap in the face to welcome a new visitor, or the fact that
javascript disabled browsers were forced to view his "art"
inappropriately. Do you suppose this experience may be tainting my
opinions?
I wonder how you and I can be in so much agreement and yet this thread
would suggest otherwise? If blanket rules, or any rules for that matter
could be condensed into some kind of formulaic approach, there would be
no need for people like us (I'm sure the people in Redmond would have
packaged it by now if that were possible). Sometimes even "good" rules
need to be broken. That's why I think of them as suggestions, or
starting points, not inflexible constraints.
It's probably here:
http://images.google.com/images?q=jeri ryan&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en...
"rf said:Jpegs will be required. Might even pop over the river and watch
Neredbojias said:dorayme... is a repeat-offender.
Give 'em heck, do!dorayme said:Just don't throw the empty tinnies in, there might be a few, the
show will not be short, I am likely to show some resistance...
I once left to soak overnight my industrial strength leather gardening
gloves, in dishwasher (you know, the machine type, not the wife type)
powder. Next morning the gloves had totally disappeared into a slimy
sludge at the bottom of the sink.
Should be suitable
I have been very restrained in language, perhaps you are judging
by one rude word I could not resist in your personal website blog
(which I distractedly did not pay attention to, vaguely thinking
it was a test and you would vet it all). But, you f#¶&^!!
b%3@!!*, you let me hang out to dry in public and now everyone
knows my low class.
Apparently some very famous and good public figures are truly
foul mouthed in private.
Give 'em heck, do!
It's probably here:
http://images.google.com/images?q=jeri ryan&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&b
tnG=Google+Search
Neredbojias said:Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:26:43
GMT
El Kabong scribed:
To be semantically correct, you probably should have said "doh".
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.