Alternative to cocoon?

Jeremy (5)

Usenet Archive
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
My requirements are very simple: When a user browses to an XML document, the server should parse the document, apply its stylesheet, and spit the HTML at the client. Apache Cocoon is a slow, bloated mess that is impossible to configure and it is just not right at all for this purpose. I have no interest whatsoever in servlets, all I need is easy-to-configure server-side XSL transformation. Has anyone come up with an apache module that does this without having to do tomcat and cocoon and sitemaps and all that jazz?

Thanks,
-Jeremy
 

Alexander Schatten

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jan 17, 2000
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
My requirements are very simple: When a user browses to an XML document, the server should parse the document, apply its stylesheet, and spit the HTML at the client. Apache Cocoon is a slow, bloated mess that is impossible to configure and it is just not right at all for this purpose.

I am sorry, just this sentence makes clear, that you have

(1) no idea about Cocoon

(2) did not try versions after 1.8

as a matter of fact: Cocoon is extremyl powerful, stable and flexible. there are companies, that use Cocoon *because of performacne considerations*; as Cocoon proved to be faster then other server tools.

moreover, you have various options to speed up Cocoon applications using fine grained caching strategies, as an example.

additionally it has a vivid community with good support in the mailing list for users as well as for developers. it is probably one of the best Apache projects.

So I really would like you to really evaluate a project before you write dubious stuff like to one cited above.

Alex
 

Jeremy (5)

Usenet Archive
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Fair enough - I apologize for bashing cocoon. I'm sure it's an excellent solution for more advanced needs, but for my needs it is just plain overkill. I don't think that whether or not there is a less flexible solution is an unreasonable question - I phrased it like a jerk because I was getting frustrated with trying to configure cocoon.

After I posted, a friend pointed me to mod_xslt which is pretty much exactly what I need. Thanks for the reply.
 

Hannes Gassert

Usenet Archive
Joined
Dec 16, 2002
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Jeremy wrote on Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:22:29 +0000:

I have no interest whatsoever in servlets, all I need is easy-to-configure server-side XSL transformation. Has anyone come up with an apache module that does this without having to do tomcat and cocoon and sitemaps and all that jazz?

Searching for XSL on
modules.apache.org yields several
results, e.g. http://modules.apache.org/search?id=334. I haven't tried any of those. What I did try indeed is Popoon[1]. As you might have guessed, Popoon is [an approximation to] a Cocoon port to PHP. It's lighter, smaller and you have it running in no time, modifications can be made very quickly - PHP is so simple. Due to sophisticated caching mechanisms it performs quite well, too. Perhaps you might wan't to have a look at that?

Best regards,
Hannes Gassert

[1] http://bitflux.ch/developer/cms/popoon.html
 

Alexander Schatten

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jan 17, 2000
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Fair enough - I apologize for bashing cocoon. I'm sure it's an excellent solution for more advanced needs, but for my needs it is just plain overkill. I don't think that whether or not there is a less flexible solution is an unreasonable question - I phrased it like a jerk because I was getting frustrated with trying to configure cocoon.

well meanwhile I suggest Cocoon also for "small" problems. the reason is, that it is extremly simple to configure:

(1) install a JDK

(2) download Cocoon, build it by starting one batch file and start it

thats it

with the outomount feature even generation of new subprojects became very easy.

Alex
 

Kermit T Tensmeyer

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 28, 2003
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Jeremy said:
My requirements are very simple: When a user browses to an XML document, the server should parse the document, apply its stylesheet, and spit the HTML at the client. Apache Cocoon is a slow, bloated mess that is impossible to configure and it is just not right at all for this purpose. I have no interest whatsoever in servlets, all I need is easy-to-configure server-side XSL transformation. Has anyone come up with an apache module that does this without having to do tomcat and cocoon and sitemaps and all that jazz?

try axkit.org instead of implementing in java/tomcat use perl/modperl instead.
 

Nick Kew

Usenet Archive
Joined
Jul 21, 2000
Messages
292
Reaction score
0
one of infinite monkeys said:
as a matter of fact: Cocoon is extremyl powerful, stable and flexible. there are companies, that use Cocoon *because of performacne considerations*; as Cocoon proved to be faster then other server tools.

Erm - what other server tools?

The context of the question was XSLT processing, and I have indeed encountered one monumentally slow XSLT module[1]. I guess if you compare to that, then cocoon or anything else comes out as much faster. But if you take any implementation worth looking at from this (or last) year you can expect a different result.
moreover, you have various options to speed up Cocoon applications using fine grained caching strategies, as an example.

Likewise Apache 2 with a sensible XSLT filter.

Oh, and of course XSLT is just one application. If you want to suggest another, that's fine: I expect I could implement a faster version of XYZ with Apache 2, FWIW. That of course excepts jobs where "java" is part of the requirements spec; maybe where a company is heavily locked-in or the pointy-hairs can't grasp the difference between a tool and an outcome.
additionally it has a vivid community with good support in the mailing list for users as well as for developers. it is probably one of the best Apache projects.

httpd doesn't do too badly ...
So I really would like you to really evaluate a project before you write dubious stuff like to one cited above.

Fair comment on the OP, but IMHO your post may be in danger of making a similar mistake, praising a product by comparing it to unspecified and perhaps inappropriate competition.

Hmmm ... I'd better shut up now; I'm probably falling straight into the same rhetorical trap.

[1] it was based on Sablotron, and running the commandline "sabcmd" from CGI was several hundred times faster.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
548,208
Messages
3,104,802
Members
249,594
Latest member
henrywalsh

Latest Threads

Top