B
Bruno Desthuilliers
Yves Dorfsman a écrit :
I'm afraid you just don't understand what Python's "variable" are.
You're really worrying about a non-issue here. Seriously.
No language can be everything to everyone and still retain any kind of
consistency. And the Python's team really try to keep a good balance
between features and consistency (and so far mostly succeed IHMO).
Now, of course, suggesting features or potential improvements *is* a
good idea (and FWIW there's an official way to do so : PEPs). But this
doesn't mean that each an any such proposition is a good idea by itself,
nor that it makes any sense wrt/ Python's design, nor that it's worth
implementing it.
I'm afraid you just don't understand what Python's "variable" are.
You're really worrying about a non-issue here. Seriously.
Than what's the point of wanting a better language if every time we run
in something that looks wrong, or something that could be done better we
should just "get over it" ?
No language can be everything to everyone and still retain any kind of
consistency. And the Python's team really try to keep a good balance
between features and consistency (and so far mostly succeed IHMO).
Now, of course, suggesting features or potential improvements *is* a
good idea (and FWIW there's an official way to do so : PEPs). But this
doesn't mean that each an any such proposition is a good idea by itself,
nor that it makes any sense wrt/ Python's design, nor that it's worth
implementing it.