AP -- MeAmI.org Paces Google

[Dave Angel]

This is what there is at the bottom of page 3:

<< Conclusion: Binary revisions are allowed given the above formulas. >>

So I don't understand the proposed solution for the "P = NP"
problem.

David Bernier

"Professor X" is yet another alias for the hoaxter who started this
thread, and presumably who created the website.

 

[Musatov]

Martin Musatov wrote:

This is what there is at the bottom of page 3:

<< Conclusion: Binary revisions are allowed given the above formulas. >>

So I don't understand the proposed solution for the "P = NP"
problem.

David Bernier

P can be equal to N and not P when it is in brackets vs. parantheses.
The dots ib the equation in "P = [dots] <i>N</i> (dots) <i>P</i>. The
difference between the brackets and the paranthesis represents a
margin of time in computation. The dots present in the paper (I am not
able to render them here, but they are in the .pdf file) represent a
non-deterministic symbolic means of representing language. Thank you
for your respone.

The conclusion means traditional characters and symbols are not ideal
for binary computation.