blogspot is not a total waste

L

Lew

For a while now I have been calling blogspot.com "blogspot.spam" because of
all the nasty spammers who use it for their plagiarized, poorly-written crap
that they try to sucker us newsgroupies into. Others have told me not to
blame blogspot just because it makes mid-nineteenth century Colorado look like
a bastion of lawfulness.

Reviewing the latest from NetBeans (www.netbeans.org) I got linked to
<http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com/2007/09/netbeans-60-ide-to-own.html>
which is actually a Java-relevant discussion of the new version of NetBeans.
(It's about a product, but it's someone's personal experience and it's a free
product.)

OK, corral my preconceptions and toss'em out. blogspot is abused, but I guess
not to blame.
 
A

Andrew Thompson

Lew said:
For a while now I have been calling blogspot.com "blogspot.spam" because of
all the nasty spammers who use it for their plagiarized, poorly-written crap
that they try to sucker us newsgroupies into. Others have told me not to
blame blogspot just because it makes mid-nineteenth century Colorado look like
a bastion of lawfulness. ...
OK, corral my preconceptions and toss'em out. blogspot is abused, but I guess
not to blame.

In regard to the spammers, do you make use of the 'Flag'?
<http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42517>

Does it cause the material to disappear quickly?
(I am a little skeptical their 'Flag' would be effective
for plagiarists or spammers - it did not seem to
allow any inclusion of comment as to what was
objectionable.)

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.athompson.info/andrew/

Message posted via JavaKB.com
http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200709/1
 
L

Lew

Andrew said:
In regard to the spammers, do you make use of the 'Flag'?
<http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42517>

The "flag" requires that one have navigated to the spammer's page in order to
flag it. I don't usually bother to visit these spammers' pages, except to
identify if they are plagiarizing and to so report to the group if they are.
I don't bother doing even that if the spam is obviously commercial, but for
the "interview questions" and "Java ebooks" and like spammers I sometimes do.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
474,432
Messages
2,571,682
Members
48,796
Latest member
Greg L.

Latest Threads

Top