enhancing decorator signatures

[Diez B. Roggisch]

Hi,

I'm using Michele S's decorator-module to create decorators with matching
signatures, for better error-catching.

However, I now want to enrich the signature of a generic wrapper so that the
new function will accept more parameters (keyword only). These additional
parameters are consumed by the wrapper and not passed to the decorated
function.

So something like this would be cool:

@enriched_decorator("bar")
def some_decorator(f, **args, **kwargs):
bar = kwargs.pop("bar")
return f(**args, **kwargs)

Anybody has done something like this?

Diez

 

[castironpi]

Hi,

I'm using Michele S's decorator-module to create decorators with matching
signatures, for better error-catching.

However, I now want to enrich the signature of a generic wrapper so that the
new function will accept more parameters (keyword only). These additional
parameters are consumed by the wrapper and not passed to the decorated
function.

So something like this would be cool:

@enriched_decorator("bar")
def some_decorator(f, **args, **kwargs):
    bar = kwargs.pop("bar")
    return f(**args, **kwargs)

Anybody has done something like this?

Diez

Diez,

notfound= object()
@enriched_decorator("bar")
def some_decorator(f, *args, **kwargs):
bar = kwargs.pop("bar",notfound)
return f(*args, **kwargs)

Then you would declare your function:

@some_decorator
def funA( x, y, z ):
do( x, y )
make( z )

And be able to call it:

funA( 0, 1, 2, bar= 'what' )

so some_decorator consumes 'bar' and preserves x, y, and z. It's
working fine. What did you want to ask about?

--Roggisch has plonked me in the past. Can someone reply to this
message to the group so they'll see it?--