U
usenet0
Hi,
I am trying to trace a weird bug in a program, and it looks like it
comes from something like a constructor I have declared in its class,
but I have not implemented. You might say "So why don't you just
implement it?"... It's just that doing this recreates the bug I have...
What surprises me is that the compiler does not complain. I create an
object whose constructor is declared but not implemented. How can this
be?
The question is: is there in gcc an option to tell him to complain
about this?
The compiler I use is QCC in QNX, which is a wrapper for gcc 2.95.2
19991024.
Thanks,
Olivier
I am trying to trace a weird bug in a program, and it looks like it
comes from something like a constructor I have declared in its class,
but I have not implemented. You might say "So why don't you just
implement it?"... It's just that doing this recreates the bug I have...
What surprises me is that the compiler does not complain. I create an
object whose constructor is declared but not implemented. How can this
be?
The question is: is there in gcc an option to tell him to complain
about this?
The compiler I use is QCC in QNX, which is a wrapper for gcc 2.95.2
19991024.
Thanks,
Olivier