Inheritance doesn't work

[zefciu]

I have a problem with inheritance under python. The class definition is
longer, but the troublesome thing is:

from PIL import Image
class MandelbrotImage (Image):
pass

I am getting the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "mandelimage.py", line 3, in ?
class MandelImage (Image):
TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases
module.__init__() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)


I am using python 2.4 from the Debian (Sid) packages.

Is it a bug, or am I doing something wrong?
zefciu

--
-----BEGIN zefciu's GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GS d-(+) s+++:-- a-- C++ UL P- L++(+++) E--- W+ N++ o?
K? w-- M- V? PS-(--) PE++(+) Y PGP+ t 5 X R tv- b++
DI D- G e>+++ h!>-- y? UF+
------END zefciu's GEEK CODE BLOCK------

 

[Robert Kern]

I have a problem with inheritance under python. The class definition is
longer, but the troublesome thing is:

from PIL import Image
class MandelbrotImage (Image):
pass

I am getting the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "mandelimage.py", line 3, in ?
class MandelImage (Image):
TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases
module.__init__() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)


I am using python 2.4 from the Debian (Sid) packages.

Is it a bug, or am I doing something wrong?

You're doing something wrong. PIL.Image is a module, not a class.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco

 

[Fredrik Lundh]

I have a problem with inheritance under python. The class definition is
longer, but the troublesome thing is:

from PIL import Image

that's a module, not a class.

class MandelbrotImage (Image):
pass

PIL's Image class isn't designed to be inherited from. to create new
images, use the Image.new() factory.

</F>

 

[John Salerno]

class MandelbrotImage (Image):
pass


I am getting the following error:

File "mandelimage.py", line 3, in ?
class MandelImage (Image):

How do you get that error with that code?

 

[Fredrik Lundh]

How do you get that error with that code?

$ python
.... pass
....
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases
module.__init__() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)

</F>

 

[J. Clifford Dyer]

$ python

.... pass
....
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases
module.__init__() takes at most 2 arguments (3 given)

</F>

Sure, but I think the question was more about how code that references
"MandelbrotImage could yield a stack that references MandelImage.

 

[John Salerno]

Sure, but I think the question was more about how code that references
"MandelbrotImage could yield a stack that references MandelImage.

Yeah, I guess I could have been more specific.

 

[Fredrik Lundh]

Sure, but I think the question was more about how code that references
"MandelbrotImage could yield a stack that references MandelImage.

well, it's been obvious for quite some time that we've now reached a
point in Python's quest for world domination where newbies start
tinkering with Python before they learn how to cut and paste text, so
I wasn't really expecting anyone to be surprised by a trivial typo.

</F>

 

[John Salerno]

well, it's been obvious for quite some time that we've now reached a
point in Python's quest for world domination where newbies start
tinkering with Python before they learn how to cut and paste text, so
I wasn't really expecting anyone to be surprised by a trivial typo.

</F>

Well, I can't say I was surprised, but my main (subtle, understated,
sneaky) point was how do you expect anyone to help you when you aren't
even giving us the proper information that produces the error?

 

[Fredrik Lundh]

Well, I can't say I was surprised, but my main (subtle, understated,
sneaky) point was how do you expect anyone to help you when you aren't
even giving us the proper information that produces the error?

I've stopped trying to make that point; I just apply a basic error correction
algorithm to the posted code, and try to make sense of the result. sometimes
it misfires (e.g. if there are multiple errors in the code), but it usually gets me
pretty close to the actual issue.

</F>