Java Bean Question

[Chris ( Val )]

I'm not certain that all versions of NetBeans have all templates set up to do
that.

I am not certain of all versions either, it was just an observation.

More importantly, I presented it to show you that there was some
influence from Sun (especially for newcomers), using the power of
suggestion.

In any event, if you don't want NetBeans to insert an explicit constructor,
remove it from the template.

Yes, of course

[snip - I read your latter post]

Unless you know that you can provide it implicitly, which is a very basic rule
of Java.

Yes, I know that.
The rule is exactly the same fror C++.

Its a matter of style and wording in the tutorials that is
confusing

Sure, but don't hang on to the confusion. You've had a clarification, now let
go of your personal history and move on.

I take your point very well, and that is exactly what I am
trying to do, but it will take a little time to adjust,
thats all.

That's why they pay us the big bucks. If it was easy, everyone would do it.

Hehe, yeah!

Thanks,

Chris

 

[Roedy Green]

By "their own different serialisation mechanism", do you mean
that you implement a different interface to Serializable?

no, I mean the PersistenceDelegate mechanism.

 

[Chris ( Val )]

no, I mean the PersistenceDelegate mechanism.

Ok, thanks for the information.