maps and unions

D

David Thompson

Why is clari.local.florida discussing programming techniques?
Alternatively, why do you care how a bunch of forthheads confuse two
languages they do not understand?
c.l.f is also comp.lang.fortran, and it's easy to find out that the OP
participates there but not in ..forth. His posts are sometimes
(often?) opaque and confusing, but this thread was pretty clear.

Before Fortran standardized (in '90) its near-equivalent to C struct,
several important Fortran implementations had an extension MAP to do
effectively the same thing, and at least some of them further allowed
it to overlay things in a fashion analogous to C union.
 
R

Richard Bos

David Thompson said:
Why is clari.local.florida discussing programming techniques?
Alternatively, why do you care how a bunch of forthheads confuse two
languages they do not understand?
c.l.f is also comp.lang.fortran,[/QUOTE]

Gosh, ya thunk?

Richard
 
L

Larry Gates

I would not even approach your peter without a full-size caber, a bucket
of creosote, and a pair of industrial-strength safety gloves - let alone
"render" it.


I do not care to share my C's
With jellyfishes such as these,
Particularly Portuguese.
-- not quite Flanders & Swann

Richard

Nice.

I've decided that I've exercised enough anger at lawrence keith gates, jr.
I came back to clc to shoot holes through the other keith, and never felt
the need. Now I'm gonna be talking to his wife, my oldest sister, and must
lay it to rest.

For the sake of consistency, I'll return as the flying dutchman.

Larry's fluent in portugese. His family used to possess a photograph of me
hanging over de Mauer with encouragemnt for him as he finished med school.

I golfed today in Sante Fe with Valerie. She can always count on me.
--
larry gates

It's appositival, if it's there. And it doesn't have to be there.
And it's really obvious that it's there when it's there.
-- Larry Wall in <[email protected]>
 
F

Franken Sense

In Dread Ink, the Grave Hand of David Thompson Did Inscribe:
c.l.f is also comp.lang.fortran, and it's easy to find out that the OP
participates there but not in ..forth. His posts are sometimes
(often?) opaque and confusing, but this thread was pretty clear.

Sie denken sich falsch, allerdings.

Die Neu-Konservanten wuerden alsbald an Maßstaebe relevant.
Before Fortran standardized (in '90) its near-equivalent to C struct,
several important Fortran implementations had an extension MAP to do
effectively the same thing, and at least some of them further allowed
it to overlay things in a fashion analogous to C union.

It's impossible to hold David to his first sentence here.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
474,432
Messages
2,571,682
Members
48,796
Latest member
Greg L.

Latest Threads

Top