A
Andrew Thompson
I started a thread on Google Groups - asking why Google
could not do more to suppress the torrent of spam to the
comp.lang.java.* hierarchy groups, coming from Google
Groups posters.
<http://groups.google.com/group/Groups-Suggestions/browse_frm/thread/
2a5e4a9399cb8be7/#>
A GG apologist challenged me as to what proof I had
that these spammers were using GG. My 'best guess'
was the 'X-trace' shown in the full listing of the post. So
far, *8/8* of the most recent spam posts to c.l.j.p. have
had an X-Trace indicating ..
X-Trace: posting.google.com ...
Is that correct? Is the X-trace the best indication of
where a post originates?
Sorry, I was hoping the GGA challenger might have clarified
on the original thread, but they have been conspicuous in
their absence, since I started posting links to examples..
Andrew T.
could not do more to suppress the torrent of spam to the
comp.lang.java.* hierarchy groups, coming from Google
Groups posters.
<http://groups.google.com/group/Groups-Suggestions/browse_frm/thread/
2a5e4a9399cb8be7/#>
A GG apologist challenged me as to what proof I had
that these spammers were using GG. My 'best guess'
was the 'X-trace' shown in the full listing of the post. So
far, *8/8* of the most recent spam posts to c.l.j.p. have
had an X-Trace indicating ..
X-Trace: posting.google.com ...
Is that correct? Is the X-trace the best indication of
where a post originates?
Sorry, I was hoping the GGA challenger might have clarified
on the original thread, but they have been conspicuous in
their absence, since I started posting links to examples..
Andrew T.