O
optimistx
Ot: RTFM
Here in comp.lang.javascript newsgroup some people often recommend 'RTFM'.
I have been reading the f*cking manual in my bed. The manual is on the
pillow, when I am in my bed together with my partner doing some natural
activity. I interrupt the anonymous activity in question, search the topic
feverishly while asking my partner to maintain her emotions on a static
level and within scope. The ISO-standard manual in pdf-format does not
contain images and thus the reading often takes long time. Quite often I end
up reading the manual alone, my partner disappearing somewhere.
When having learnt to know my manual better I started to teach my partners:
'According to my ECMA-ISO-standard manual paragrapah 3.2.1 you should say
'ah-ah-ah', not 'ah-ah-aah-aah', so please correct your behaviour
accordingly.' Although I am an expert nowadays many of the ladies protest me
following the standards and RTFM. Most kill the process when I give my
friendly advice.
There is a doctor across the street, who often watches my process with his
binoculars (no curtains in my bedroom). He phones me now and then during the
process, and makes - thorough remarks - about me interpreting the standards.
We often end up arguing about the standards and find that they could be
improved. Strange that women tend to ignore our most interesting discussions
and try to give me a black eye or something. Women are strange objects, at
least local ones. Perhaps I should try global ones?
Here in comp.lang.javascript newsgroup some people often recommend 'RTFM'.
I have been reading the f*cking manual in my bed. The manual is on the
pillow, when I am in my bed together with my partner doing some natural
activity. I interrupt the anonymous activity in question, search the topic
feverishly while asking my partner to maintain her emotions on a static
level and within scope. The ISO-standard manual in pdf-format does not
contain images and thus the reading often takes long time. Quite often I end
up reading the manual alone, my partner disappearing somewhere.
When having learnt to know my manual better I started to teach my partners:
'According to my ECMA-ISO-standard manual paragrapah 3.2.1 you should say
'ah-ah-ah', not 'ah-ah-aah-aah', so please correct your behaviour
accordingly.' Although I am an expert nowadays many of the ladies protest me
following the standards and RTFM. Most kill the process when I give my
friendly advice.
There is a doctor across the street, who often watches my process with his
binoculars (no curtains in my bedroom). He phones me now and then during the
process, and makes - thorough remarks - about me interpreting the standards.
We often end up arguing about the standards and find that they could be
improved. Strange that women tend to ignore our most interesting discussions
and try to give me a black eye or something. Women are strange objects, at
least local ones. Perhaps I should try global ones?
