W
William Gill
I am maintaining a site where the original designer used a lot of "web
designer in a can" tools. The result is a frames based site, very
convoluted code and javascript, and pages in xhtml.
I won't go into the directory structure that goes down 5 or 6 levels for
html pages, a separate 5 or 6 level path for the images, and an image
naming convention that uses the titles of the parent levels (i.e.
root/level1/level2/level3/level4/level5/images contains an image
level1_level2_level3_level4_level5_image1.jpg, where level1 etc. are
actually descriptive terms)
Anyway, I am thinking of eventually redoing the entire site, but in the
mean time are there any pitfalls to converting xhtml pages to html on an
as I go along basis (while I also clean out unneeded code snippets).
This would leave a mixed bag of xhtml and html being displayed in a
frame on parent pages. Does that pose any problems?
designer in a can" tools. The result is a frames based site, very
convoluted code and javascript, and pages in xhtml.
I won't go into the directory structure that goes down 5 or 6 levels for
html pages, a separate 5 or 6 level path for the images, and an image
naming convention that uses the titles of the parent levels (i.e.
root/level1/level2/level3/level4/level5/images contains an image
level1_level2_level3_level4_level5_image1.jpg, where level1 etc. are
actually descriptive terms)
Anyway, I am thinking of eventually redoing the entire site, but in the
mean time are there any pitfalls to converting xhtml pages to html on an
as I go along basis (while I also clean out unneeded code snippets).
This would leave a mixed bag of xhtml and html being displayed in a
frame on parent pages. Does that pose any problems?