S
Stefan Matthias Aust
Hi!
I'm a so far happy Instiki user which uses RedCoth for rendering. Is
this the right place to ask questions regarding Instiki and/or RedCloth?
I noticing the following issues with RedCloth 2.0.11.
1. This
In TI(Twilight Imperium) you can ...
isn't processed as an acronym. It seems that acronyms must have at least
3 uppercase letters. I changed the regex requiring only 2 letters, but
is there any negative side effect then?
2. This
@*game*@
is rendered as <code><strong>game</strong></code> but I want
<code>*game*</code>. I tried @\*game*@ or @\*game\*@ or @==*game*==@
without achieving the goal. Same problem with @_game_@ or other inline
codes. A workaround seems to be <code>*game*</code> but I thought that
@ has the same meaning.
If I really need bold or italics code, I could use *@game@* or _@game@_
instead. So is the above a feature or a bug?
bye
I'm a so far happy Instiki user which uses RedCoth for rendering. Is
this the right place to ask questions regarding Instiki and/or RedCloth?
I noticing the following issues with RedCloth 2.0.11.
1. This
In TI(Twilight Imperium) you can ...
isn't processed as an acronym. It seems that acronyms must have at least
3 uppercase letters. I changed the regex requiring only 2 letters, but
is there any negative side effect then?
2. This
@*game*@
is rendered as <code><strong>game</strong></code> but I want
<code>*game*</code>. I tried @\*game*@ or @\*game\*@ or @==*game*==@
without achieving the goal. Same problem with @_game_@ or other inline
codes. A workaround seems to be <code>*game*</code> but I thought that
@ has the same meaning.
If I really need bold or italics code, I could use *@game@* or _@game@_
instead. So is the above a feature or a bug?
bye