Stack level too deep

J

John Ky

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Hi,

Is there any way for me to increase the stack size? My stack is huge:

playback.rb:38:in `play_back': stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

Cheers,

-John
 
J

John Ky

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

By the way, I'm sure it's not infinite recursion. It's just the nature of
my algorithm:

class PlaybackBase
def record(&block)
return PlaybackChain.new(self, block)
end
end

class PlaybackNil < PlaybackBase
def initialize(root)
@root = root
end

def play_back(&block)
block.call(@root)
end
end

class PlaybackChain < PlaybackBase
def initialize(tail, block)
@tail = tail
@block = block
end

def play_back(&block)
@block.call(proc { @tail.play_back(&block) })
end
end

And it's better that I use the system stack rather than my own because it
preserves nice behaviours with blocks

$array1 = [1, 2, 3]
$array2 = ['a', 'b', 'c']

$tail = PlaybackNil.new(nil)

$tail = $tail.record do |block|
$array1.each do |value|
$value1 = value
block.call
end
end

$tail = $tail.record do |block|
$array2.each do |value|
$value2 = value
block.call
end
end

$tail.play_back do
puts "#{$value1}, #{$value2}"
end

Above prints

1, a
2, a
3, a
1, b
2, b
3, b
1, c
2, c
3, c

I build long playback chains like this to replay different combinations of
things.

-John
 
J

Joshua Ballanco

Hi John,

Just a friendly suggestion, but this and your previous query about
blocks make me wonder if you shouldn't be using a functional language?
Ruby has very convenient functional syntax but doesn't (at least not
to my knowledge) do the same sorts of optimizations that more purely
functional languages will do.

The other option (as I'm watching PragDave's RubyConf talk on 1.9) is
to use Fibers. Watch the bit of his talk on Fibers at http://rubyconf2008.confreaks.com/ruby-19-what-to-expect.html
starting about 18 min in.

Cheers,

Josh
 
J

John Ky

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Hi Josh,

Fibres do sound interesting.

Anyhow, I'm stuck with 1.8 at the moment. I had this idea that I could
spawn another thread with a fresh stack and continue the excution on that.
Sadly, it didn't work. Instead of getting a system stack error at 3467
levels, I'm now getting the same at 61 levels. Do I not get a new stack
with a new thread?

Thanks

-John
 
R

Roger Pack

Sadly, it didn't work. Instead of getting a system stack error at 3467
levels, I'm now getting the same at 61 levels. Do I not get a new stack
with a new thread?

Not with 1.8. I might query the ruby core group and see if they have
any insight.
-=R
 
J

John Ky

[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Hi Roger,

It looks as if I create my threads earlier when the stack isn't so full
gives me threads that have more stack space. So now, I create a thread pool
at the beginning of my program and use those threads rather than create the
threads at the point where I know I am running out of stack space.

-John
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,576
Members
45,054
Latest member
LucyCarper

Latest Threads

Top