I am sorry, I thought that even with google interface, replies
were directed to the message I answer to, building the classic
message tree. In that case, my reply would be sufficient.
One of the known problems with the google interface is that it often
leaves out the headers that permit construction of that tree. However,
that does not appear to be the case with the case with your messages in
this thread. However, you did break that mechanism when you changed the
subject to 'was: "mod operator for signed integers"'. You should have
continued the same discussion, not started a new one.
You're right, though, that most newsreaders provide methods for going
back to previous messages, but it's poor form to write your message in
such a way that it requires use of those facilities to understand what
you're saying.
There are several reasons why this is the case. First of all, not all
newsreaders provide that capability. Secondly, the message you're
replying to might not reach the reader's news server until after your
response; it might never get there. Even if it has already arrived, it
might have been filtered out by the reader's news server, or by the
reader's spam filters.
The third reason seems weakest, but is the most widely applicable, and
as a result, the most important: having to go back to the previous
message is slightly, but unnecessarily, more difficult than getting the
needed information from within the same message. It's not particularly
difficult with most news-reading software to insert a copy of the
message you're replying to, and then trimming that copy down to contain
only the information needed to give suitable context to your response.
Do so.