D
Daniel Rucareanu
I have the following script:
function Test(){}
Test.F = function(){}
Test.F.FF = function(){}
Test.F.FF.FFF = function(){}
Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF = function(){}
//var alias = function(){};
var alias = Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF;
var date1 = new Date();
for (var index = 0; index < 100000; index++)
Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF();
//alias();
var date2 = new Date();
print(date2.getTime() - date1.getTime());
Why is it when I use Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF() I get around 100ms and when I
get alias() I get around 280ms?
What is going on here? This is something I would have never anticipated
and I think that neither of you as well. Aliases whould work faster
then doing lockups at each iteration, right?
Also if I uncomment this line: var alias = function(){}, from 280ms I
get a drop to 265 ms?
Does anybody now the reason for this? It only happends in Firefox (I
have 1.5.0.6). IE and Opera behaive as they should
function Test(){}
Test.F = function(){}
Test.F.FF = function(){}
Test.F.FF.FFF = function(){}
Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF = function(){}
//var alias = function(){};
var alias = Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF;
var date1 = new Date();
for (var index = 0; index < 100000; index++)
Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF();
//alias();
var date2 = new Date();
print(date2.getTime() - date1.getTime());
Why is it when I use Test.F.FF.FFF.FFFF() I get around 100ms and when I
get alias() I get around 280ms?
What is going on here? This is something I would have never anticipated
and I think that neither of you as well. Aliases whould work faster
then doing lockups at each iteration, right?
Also if I uncomment this line: var alias = function(){}, from 280ms I
get a drop to 265 ms?
Does anybody now the reason for this? It only happends in Firefox (I
have 1.5.0.6). IE and Opera behaive as they should