No, it is not absolutely right to go on the offensive like you have.
Was it right for you to be pounced on for "spamming"? Not, IMO. But
I did NOT SPAM. Not for this Group's standards in any case.
I posted a link to a contact form where anyone interested in
partnering with 1001webs.net could get in touch with us.
ONE time.
Viper then sent e-mails all over the place claiming we were the worst
kind of Spammers on the face on Earth and asking to have our accounts
suspended.
And I profusely apologized for that, although I didn't believe I was
doing such a horrible wrongdoing.
But I did apologize because I do hate Spammers too and I thought it
would be a good way of sending out a message for anyone trying to spam
here.
But it's clear that I should have never bothered to apologize for
something I did ONE time and that about everyone here does on a
regular basis.
And now that's the only thing you keep repeating over and over in
order to justify the attacks on my interests. Just because I chose ONE
time to post a link to a contact form instead of posting our e-mail
address for obvious reasons.
that doesn't also give you the immediate right to go on the attack,
cyberstalking people, digging into their tax records and everything
else. That kind of behavior is completely deplorable and ultimately
has further shown you to be far worse of a person than just a
"spammer".
I did NOT go on the attack until they attacked me.
I did NOT cyberstalk people until they cyberstalked me.
I did NOT dig into anyone's tax records until the moron accused me of
being
"a pathetic wanna-be with no business sense and no ethics."
and a
"scammers want to try to hide their real identity, like 1001webs."
besides posting what the idiot thought were my personal details.
And it looks like the majority of others in these groups agree with my
interpretation and not yours.
Yeah, right.
And 95% of Germans agreed with Hitler.
So what?
Doesn't mean he was right, does it?
What you've shown are *possible* instances where Jerry's corporate
charter was dissolved for not paying taxes. As a resident of the
state of MD who also has had a corporation in this state, I can tell
you that the easiest & simplest way to dissolve a corporation is to
stop doing business, don't pay taxes and the state forfeits the
charter. Stopping business is *not* the same as being a tax cheat, and
since you don't know the circumstances of how that business was
dissolved (and the MD site doesn't state), any conclusions you come to
are based purely on conjecture.
If you want to dissolve a corporation and stop doing business, then
you shouldn't be advertising the services of that inexistent company
on the Internet like I have proved he does.
If you do, you're committing FRAUD.
Beyond that, what makes you think you have the right to go prying into
people's personal lives? Whether it be possible police records, or
where Chaddy goes to to school, you're again only making yourself look
like the jerk here. For one thing, you don't know whether the results
are for the exact person you're looking for anyway. Searching my own
name shows about 8 results, only two of which are actually me. I had
a fun morning checking out people I know. My own wife's name comes up
with about 20 results - NONE of which are actually her (she has a
pretty common first name). So, the results you see when typing in
Jerry's name may not be him at all. Here you are, however, blabbing
on about a criminal record when there's no definitive proof you have
the right guy!
I posted both Jerry Stuckler's name together with his address.
Now, it would be quite extraordinary to discover than there's more
than one STUCKLE, JERRY D, living at 9920 BRIXTON LANE, BETHESDA, MD
Zip Code:20817-0000, don't you reckon, jerk?
And I didn't post anyone's personal details until the moron attempted
to do the same with mine.
Unsuccessfully, because he's a real jerk, but he tried.
And even if it was accurate someone's criminal record has absolutely
nothing to do with the topic of this newsgroup. Let's take myself as
example. I was charged with assault & battery in 1991. Explain to me
what relevance a fight 16 years in the past has on the topic of
discussion here on AWW? Nothing. Instead, your continued digging
into other people's lives is being archived for the world to see.
Aassault & battery in 1991 has nothing remotely to do with DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE in 2003, in my uneducated opinion.
In any case you should ask all those questions to Jerry, who was the
one that started the attacks on my reputation and interests
BTW, "for the world to see" are incidentally the words he used when he
posted what he thought were my personal details.
You seem to be implying that in my case you would have not retaliated,
although this very post of yours belies that supposition.
Congratulations to you.
You have just proved yourself to be a real jerk with absolutely no
arguments.
