ANSI C grammar dependency graph

[aarklon]

Hi all,

here is the on ANSI C grammar dependency graph Flickr - Photo
Sharing!
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=281055530&size=o

 

[pete]

Hi all,

here is the on ANSI C grammar dependency graph Flickr - Photo
Sharing!
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=281055530&size=o

How do you use it?

 

[Ben Pfaff]

here is the on ANSI C grammar dependency graph

It's kind of pretty. Simpler than I might have guessed, too.

 

[Richard Heathfield]

Ben Pfaff said:

It's kind of pretty. Simpler than I might have guessed, too.

The dot file would have been a nice touch, for those with bandwidth
restrictions. (To be fair, it's easy enough to make your own, either from
a copy of the Standard or from K&R2.)

 

[Chris Hills]

Hi all,

here is the on ANSI C grammar dependency graph Flickr - Photo
Sharing!
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=281055530&size=o

Do you have one for ISO-C?

 

[Richard Heathfield]

Chris Hills said:

Do you have one for ISO-C?

Since ANSI C and ISO C are isomorphic (or, if you prefer, ansimorphic), it
is clear that IF his existing graph correctly describes ANSI C, it also
correctly describes ISO C.

 

[pete]

Ben Pfaff said:


The dot file would have been a nice touch, for those with bandwidth
restrictions. (To be fair, it's easy enough to make your own,
either from
a copy of the Standard or from K&R2.)

I can't understand what it means.

It starts with translation_unit and then there's
an arrow pointing to external_declarations.

I understand that a translation unit,
is entirely made up of external declarations.
But as for the rest of it,
I don't understand what relationships
are supposed to be indicated by the arrows.

I have no idea what the relationship between
type_specifier and type_id is supposed to be,
or even what "type_id" is supposed to mean.