Andrew said:
Slightly off topic. Here's an interesting quote from a respected
scientific web site ;-)
"...a hobby which demands a large investment of time and money, and you
get a fanboy. They defend their favourite stuff and ridicule the
competition, ignoring facts if they contradict their emotional connection."
<url:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/06/fanboyism-and-brand-loyalty/#more-400337
Andrew Poulos
I talked to someone about their favourite JS library the other evening
over a beer. I asked why he used it & he then explained it was "small"
and "did what it needs to"
After suggesting an alternative library (& him slating said library for
not doing the "same things" as his favourite library) he then said "it
wasn't a large library"
I'm finding that most 'Javascript framework' contributers, l33ters,
loudmouths/advocates & fanboys seem to be full of contradictions,
poison, hot air, etc. I didn't even bother mentioning facility
detection, reflection, unit testing, etc
jQuery - best of a bad bunch really. Its full of hacks, browser detects,
copy and pasting, etc. Stuff that most sane people were trying to remove
from their sites some 6 years ago as it was considered brittle then & is
even brittler now
If your thinking about using it instead read a FAQ or book(s) about
Javascript, write your own library & don't bother with jQuery, Dojo, etc
(the usual suspects)
Fro