Call for signatories for J2

[Thomas Heller]

The J2 proposal is as complete as it will ever be.

http://www.aminus.org/rbre/python/pydec.html

Against. Thomas Heller

why: pie syntax reads better.

 

[Christopher T King]

I give a vote FOR this proposal. Good job putting this all together.

- Chris King

 

[Anthony Baxter]

Note that Robert has sent the completed proposal to python-dev, and in
fine Python tradition, buggered off for the weekend. So I'm not
entirely sure it's worthwhile posting more for/against messages now.

 

[Aahz]

For.

I wish we'd use a better keyword than 'using' which would have a
bazillion other possible and useful future interpretations. Of the
possible keywords mentioned on the site, several (by, per, through, via)
appear better to me, and I'd particularly love the three-letter ones as
they'd align well with 'def' -- my own preference would be 'per'.

-1 on ``per``
--
Aahz ([email protected]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a
koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You
discover truth everytime you use it." (e-mail address removed)

 

[Aahz]

All right, with the caveat that I'd prefer C1, I'm voting FOR.
--
Aahz ([email protected]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a
koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You
discover truth everytime you use it." (e-mail address removed)

 

[Scott David Daniels]

For J2

Peter Otten

Though I don't like "using".

I think it would be great fun to add this to the document index under
"J2" as well as the keyword finally decied upon (which begins to look
like "using". We all know in great detail what a "J2" is, but in five
years it will be great folklore.

-Scott David Daniels
(e-mail address removed)