Different methods to call a subroutine!

[pod69]

Hello,

Is there any difference if i call a subroutine wit subroutine() or
&subroutine() - whats the different with the "&"!
Can anyone tell me that?

thx

 

[kens]

Hello,

Is there any difference if i call a subroutine wit subroutine() or
&subroutine() - whats the different with the "&"!
Can anyone tell me that?

thx

Take a look at the documentation:

perldoc perlsub

Ken

 

[Dr.Ruud]

(e-mail address removed) schreef:

Is there any difference if i call a subroutine wit subroutine() or
&subroutine() - whats the different with the "&"!
Can anyone tell me that?

See perlsub.

 

[Paul Lalli]

Is there any difference if i call a subroutine wit subroutine() or
&subroutine() - whats the different with the "&"!
Can anyone tell me that?

Everyone so far has instructed you to read `perldoc perlsub`. That's
good advice. To help you narrow it down, the shortest answer is:

& disables prototype-checking and passes the current @_.

Search for "prototype" and "@_" within perlsub for more details.

Paul Lalli

 

[Tad McClellan]

Is there any difference if i call a subroutine wit subroutine() or
&subroutine() -

Yes.


whats the different with the "&"!

You are expected to check the Perl FAQ *before* posting to
the Perl newsgroup.

perldoc -q "&"

What’s the difference between calling a function as &foo and foo()?


(which also answers the difference between &foo() and foo() )

Can anyone tell me that?

Anyone with the courtesy to check the FAQ could.