W
windandwaves said:
rf said:That white on black is very hard to read. I had to significantly
enlarge my font size.
Why fixed width?
rf said:That white on black is very hard to read. I had to significantly enlarge my
font size.
Why fixed width?
windandwaves said:rf wrote:
Thank you for your feedback.... Design is important here so therefore there
is fixed width.
For font-size, try CTRL ++
Thank you again
Is it harder to read that black on white?
Design.
Hi Richard
Thank you for your feedback.... Design is important here so therefore there
is fixed width. For font-size, try CTRL ++
Is it harder to read that black on white?
From: rf said:That white on black is very hard to read. I had to significantly enlarge my
font size.
Why fixed width?
windandwaves said:
dorayme said:Yes. There is proof. There was a 1976 study done showing that
reaction times to warnings in white on black were significantly
slower than black on white. And RF and I and a lot of folk find
it more difficult. I know it looks nice sometimes and I do it
myself for menu items and other things. But when folk are
expected to actually read a fair bit of text it is a very bad
idea. Try to make it easy for users... it is our job to try to
think nice design and easy for most people to use...
windandwaves said:
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.