G
Guest
Is this possible or am I barking up the wrong hydrant?
I want to have a FormView (ASP.NET 2.0, obviously) on a web page that's
populated via a stored procedure. There are two sections of the view that
show data in sort of a parent-child relationship. I want to use a stored
procedure for the update (same proc for both sections), and be able to update
each section separately, but the column names from the retrieve procedure are
different than the column names in the update procedure. It may sound funky,
but for what it's doing the UI really makes sense. I have the retrieve
working just fine, but I'll be damned if I can dope out how to take care of
the update.
I've been writing software a long time, but I'm relatively new to this .NET
thing. It's frustrating, to say the least. Is it just me or has Redmond
made data access *way* more complicated than it needs to be?
thx
jeff
I want to have a FormView (ASP.NET 2.0, obviously) on a web page that's
populated via a stored procedure. There are two sections of the view that
show data in sort of a parent-child relationship. I want to use a stored
procedure for the update (same proc for both sections), and be able to update
each section separately, but the column names from the retrieve procedure are
different than the column names in the update procedure. It may sound funky,
but for what it's doing the UI really makes sense. I have the retrieve
working just fine, but I'll be damned if I can dope out how to take care of
the update.
I've been writing software a long time, but I'm relatively new to this .NET
thing. It's frustrating, to say the least. Is it just me or has Redmond
made data access *way* more complicated than it needs to be?
thx
jeff