P
Patrick Laurent
On what grounds?
Because:
-I don't know good assembly
-I want a partable solution
-no suggestion is feasible in an reasonable time (it tends towards infinity)
Can you or have you programmed signal processing with meta-programming? IBecause you can't imagine any way doesn't mean it's not possible.
have not.
Could you give me internet pages, where meta-programming was succesful used
for signal processing or for any mathematical applications?
I said 'I think', I could have said 'I suppose', or 'it seems'. I did not... so you *can* imagine a way to do it, then ...?
How do you know that?
say 'I know'. I am not good in english. If 'to think' means 'to know
something for sure', then I used the wrong verb. Did I?
I use a big template depth (reached once 36), and compilers already have
some difficulties.
GCC is for example far away from ICL to optimized my code. ICL is a clear
winner.
So meta-programming for FFT seems to be an utopie.
It seems indeed there is no magic fix. I don't wan't to reprogram everythingPatrick: Ioannis has offered a range of (to my mind reasonable and
helpful) suggestions which you have summarily trashed
without any hint of justification. How do we help you? You seem to be
after some magic quick fix - has it dawned on you
yet that perhaps there isn't one?
(in C or whatever) just to make GCC happy.
I asked on this topic if it is possible to bring GCC at the same speed as
ICL for my case, it seems it is not.
I close the debate
Thanks to everyone.
Patrick