J
javainfo
How can i refresh IFRAME and load data through AJAX?
R
Randy Webb
javainfo said the following on 3/9/2006 5:49 AM:
Sure.
Sure.
G
Gale
Randy said:
AJAX != refresh
T
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
Gale said:
Nonsense.
PointedEars
T
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
Tony said:
I beg your pardon?
PointedEars
R
Randy Webb
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said the following on 3/9/2006 8:03 PM:
You need a sense of humor Thomas.
But, Ajax was a British warship in World War II
You need a sense of humor Thomas.
But, Ajax was a British warship in World War II
T
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
Randy said:
Believe it or not: I /have/ a great deal of humor (and that does not mean
transpiration). However, that does no help you if you do not understand
the joke. Hence my question.
Among other things
PointedEars
T
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
Tony said:Randy said:You need a sense of humor Thomas.
But, Ajax was a British warship in World War II
What amuses me is the obvious (at least to me) INTENT behind Jesse
coming up with "AJAX", after the previously enjoyed popularity of
"SOAP" [...]
Ahhh -- got it now
\V/ PointedEars
R
Randy Webb
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said the following on 3/10/2006 2:40 PM:
Fair enough. A lot of that joke would lose it's implications when
translated
Fair enough. A lot of that joke would lose it's implications when
translated
R
Randy Webb
Tony said the following on 3/10/2006 1:26 PM:
What amuses me the most is how most of the people who come posting "I
want AJAX" don't have the first clue what it really is. It's a term some
board room pundit heard and they just had to have it. Then, at the
country club they can brag "Yeah, we use AJAX on our site".
Too bad I use more reliable methods
What amuses me the most is how most of the people who come posting "I
want AJAX" don't have the first clue what it really is. It's a term some
board room pundit heard and they just had to have it. Then, at the
country club they can brag "Yeah, we use AJAX on our site".
Too bad I use more reliable methods
I
Ivan Marsh
Believe it or not: I /have/ a great deal of humor (and that does not
mean transpiration). However, that does no help you if you do not
understand the joke. Hence my question.
Among other things
I'd have to assume the warship got its name from the Greek warrior of the
same name... I have no idea where he got his name.
L
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen
Ivan Marsh said:
His mother?
/L
J
John W. Kennedy
Tony said:
Ajax is also sold in the UK. It would appear that Comet is not.
--
John W. Kennedy
"But now is a new thing which is very old--
that the rich make themselves richer and not poorer,
which is the true Gospel, for the poor's sake."
-- Charles Williams. "Judgement at Chelmsford"
D
Danny Stolle
Hi,
Well 'to AJAX or not to AJAX' that is the question I was asking my self.
Do I realy need AJAX and when I saw a script developed with javascript
and that the script created an ActiveX object, my heart stopped! After
being defribillated I thought of remote scripting using an IFRAME,
after all I read a lot about how to do this and I tried to give it a shot.
Well success granted and I got my first (not final yet) remote
scripting; the alternative AJAX without using AJAX. Entering a postcode,
onblur the textfield, the server script grabs the data from the database
and pushes it back to the client-script. Wow the client page didn't even
blinc.
Quite nice, need ... cewl... But euhm, now I am biting my lip.
Remote scripting using IFRAME works, is quite nice, but surely there are
lots of disadvantages using the technique. Can somebody point me out the
disadvantages working with the IFRAME methodology? What are the drawbacks?
Thanx in advance.
Danny
Well 'to AJAX or not to AJAX' that is the question I was asking my self.
Do I realy need AJAX and when I saw a script developed with javascript
and that the script created an ActiveX object, my heart stopped! After
being defribillated
I thought of remote scripting using an IFRAME,after all I read a lot about how to do this and I tried to give it a shot.
Well success granted and I got my first (not final yet) remote
scripting; the alternative AJAX without using AJAX. Entering a postcode,
onblur the textfield, the server script grabs the data from the database
and pushes it back to the client-script. Wow the client page didn't even
blinc.
Quite nice, need ... cewl... But euhm, now I am biting my lip.
Remote scripting using IFRAME works, is quite nice, but surely there are
lots of disadvantages using the technique. Can somebody point me out the
disadvantages working with the IFRAME methodology? What are the drawbacks?
Thanx in advance.
Danny
C
cp
hi !
can you post here your example with the activeX ?
thank you
cp
can you post here your example with the activeX ?
thank you
cp
T
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
J
Jim Ley
In general the IFRAME method is superior, it's general flaws are in
the area of accessibility, hidden frames aren't completely hidden and
can confuse users, and the higher complexity. The advantages of
faster downloads and incremental activity normally outweigh them for
data intensive systems.
Jim.
R
Randy Webb
Danny Stolle said the following on 3/17/2006 2:08 PM:
If you have to ask yourself that, you typically don't need it.
Remote scripting with IFrames has been around for almost a decade. It's
very reliable.
onblur? Don't use onblur, use onchange.
Stop, biting your lip hurts after a while.
Lack of IFrame support.
Lack of Scripting support.
Maybe lack of cross-frame scripting support.
Of all the options available, IFrame scripting is the most widely
supported/reliable method there is though.
Thanks for not top-posting in the future.
And thanks for using a decent spell checker in the future as well.
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly
Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
Answer:It destroys the order of the conversation
Question: Why?
Answer: Top-Posting.
Question: Whats the most annoying thing on Usenet?
If you have to ask yourself that, you typically don't need it.
Do I realy need AJAX and when I saw a script developed with javascript
and that the script created an ActiveX object, my heart stopped! After
being defribillated
after all I read a lot about how to do this and I tried to give it a shot.
Remote scripting with IFrames has been around for almost a decade. It's
very reliable.
onblur? Don't use onblur, use onchange.
Stop, biting your lip hurts after a while.
Lack of IFrame support.
Lack of Scripting support.
Maybe lack of cross-frame scripting support.
Of all the options available, IFrame scripting is the most widely
supported/reliable method there is though.
Thanks for not top-posting in the future.
And thanks for using a decent spell checker in the future as well.
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly
Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/
Answer:It destroys the order of the conversation
Question: Why?
Answer: Top-Posting.
Question: Whats the most annoying thing on Usenet?