Internal links

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

Hello,
there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.
Am I missing an error or are the internal links perhaps too near to the
target
point?

https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php

 

[Hywel Jenkins]

Hello,
there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.

Which two links?

What's this for?

<a href="#content"> <img src="../bilder/test.gif" height="1" width="1"
alt="Per favore, vada direttamente al contenuto principale"></a>

How do people find your 1x1 pixel link? Is this supposed to be the
point at which your internal link goes? If it is, that should be
name="content"
not
href="#content"

From a quick scan of the [remarkable] source, you've got three internal
"links", none of which are called "content".

Am I missing an error or are the internal links perhaps too near to the
target point?

https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php

I see you're still wasting your money on SSL for this. Why do you need SSL?

 

[frederick]

there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php

Which two links? You have over thirty on that page!!

 

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

Hello,
there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.

Which two links?

What's this for?

<a href="#content"> <img src="../bilder/test.gif" height="1" width="1"
alt="Per favore, vada direttamente al contenuto principale"></a>

How do people find your 1x1 pixel link? Is this supposed to be the
point at which your internal link goes? If it is, that should be
name="content"
not
href="#content"

From a quick scan of the [remarkable] source, you've got three internal
"links", none of which are called "content".

Ok. However,
They were not the ones I meant
(sorry, I neglected to mention them)
The ones I meant concern
"L´ isola Stora Amundön" " L´isola Lilla Amundön"

https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php

I see you're still wasting your money on SSL for this. Why do you need

SSL?

For example because
1) I have many password protected pages.
The use of SSL makes it more difficult for a third part to "read" the
passwords when they are used
2) there is a connection between the use of SSL and a public key, as far as
I know...
this allows an identification of the site..
3) customers can send forms and the content of these forms goes to the
server in a crypted form
4) I find confusing the way many sites are built when they contain pages
which are sent over https and others which are sent over http
so that it is more difficult for a third part to read this content while it
is sent to the server. In fact, it does not cost more to me to have all
pages sent over https than have only some of them sent

 

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

Hello,
there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.

Which two links?

What's this for?

<a href="#content"> <img src="../bilder/test.gif" height="1" width="1"
alt="Per favore, vada direttamente al contenuto principale"></a>

How do people find your 1x1 pixel link? Is this supposed to be the
point at which your internal link goes? If it is, that should be
name="content"
not
href="#content"

From a quick scan of the [remarkable] source, you've got three internal
"links", none of which are called "content".

Ok. However,
They were not the ones I meant
(sorry, I neglected to mention them)
The ones I meant concern
"L´ isola Stora Amundön" " L´isola Lilla Amundön"https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php

I see you're still wasting your money on SSL for this. Why do you need

SSL?

For example because
1) I have many password protected pages.
The use of SSL makes it more difficult for a third part to "read" the
passwords when they are used
2) there is a connection between the use of SSL and a public key, as far as
I know...
this allows an identification of the site..
3) customers can send forms and the content of these forms goes to the
server in a crypted form, so that it is more difficult for a third part to
read this content while it
is sent to the server.
4) I find confusing the way many sites are built when they contain pages
which are sent over https and others which are sent over http
In fact, it does not cost more to me to have all
pages sent over https than have only some of them sent


--
Luigi Donatello Asero

https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php
今天二零零六年四月å七日
星期一

 

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
Hello,
there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.

Which two links?

What's this for?

<a href="#content"> <img src="../bilder/test.gif" height="1" width="1"
alt="Per favore, vada direttamente al contenuto principale"></a>

How do people find your 1x1 pixel link? Is this supposed to be the
point at which your internal link goes? If it is, that should be
name="content"
not
href="#content"

From a quick scan of the [remarkable] source, you've got three internal
"links", none of which are called "content".

Ok. However,
They were not the ones I meant
(sorry, I neglected to mention them)
The ones I meant concern
"L´ isola Stora Amundön" " L´isola Lilla Amundön"

Am I missing an error or are the internal links perhaps too near to the
target point?

https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php

need
SSL?

For example because
1) I have many password protected pages.
The use of SSL makes it more difficult for a third part to "read" the
passwords when they are used
2) there is a connection between the use of SSL and a public key, as far as
I know...
this allows an identification of the site..
3) customers can send forms and the content of these forms goes to the
server in a crypted form, so that it is more difficult for a third part to
read this content while it
is sent to the server.
4) I find confusing the way many sites are built when they contain pages
which are sent over https and others which are sent over http
In fact, it does not cost more to me to have all
pages sent over https than have only some of them sent

"Read"= encode
I meant "encrypted" not "crypted"

 

[frederick]

The ones I meant concern
"L´ isola Stora Amundön" " L´isola Lilla Amundön"

They both work fine for me.

Can't see why you're using absolute paths for almost all your links,
though...

 

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

<[email protected]> skrev i meddelandet

The ones I meant concern
"L´ isola Stora Amundön" " L´isola Lilla Amundön"

They both work fine for me.

Can't see why you're using absolute paths for almost all your links,

though...


Well, there are advantages and disadvantages with that option.....
If I copy or include a menu from a file into another it works with absolute
paths regardless of the subdirectory in which the file is.
On the other hand it takes a longer time to write an absolute path.

 

[dorayme]

I see you're still wasting your money on SSL for this. Why do you need SSL?

It is very naughty to raise this issue again. Obviously, you
have not read the latest usenet etiquette rules, which includes a
remarkable one prohibiting the questioning of Luigi about
anything to do with security.

 

[Hywel Jenkins]

It is very naughty to raise this issue again. Obviously, you
have not read the latest usenet etiquette rules, which includes a
remarkable one prohibiting the questioning of Luigi about
anything to do with security.

Sorry. I've been away.