irb: 1 & 1 => 1, not true huh? I thought 1 & 1 => true

P

Peter Alvin

In irb I did:

puts 1 & 1
and get 1
shouldn't I get true?

Bottom line is this: What is Ruby idiom to test for bit mask? Is there
a more simple way to write:

if session[:permissions] & Permissions::SomeMask ==
Permissions::SomeMask
# user has permission to wash clothes, etc.
end

TIA,
Pete
 
C

Charles Oliver Nutter

Peter said:
In irb I did:

puts 1 & 1
and get 1
shouldn't I get true?

Bottom line is this: What is Ruby idiom to test for bit mask? Is there
a more simple way to write:

if session[:permissions] & Permissions::SomeMask ==
Permissions::SomeMask
# user has permission to wash clothes, etc.
end

a && b returns the first false element or the last true element.

a & b where a and b are Fixnums does a bit mask like you're looking for.

- Charlie
 
W

William James

In irb I did:

puts 1 & 1
and get 1
shouldn't I get true?

Bottom line is this: What is Ruby idiom to test for bit mask?  Is there
a more simple way to write:

if session[:permissions] & Permissions::SomeMask ==
Permissions::SomeMask
  # user has permission to wash clothes, etc.
end

TIA,

You say thanks when nobody has replied, so
you are thanking nobody. You should wait
till someone has replied before you thank
him. Otherwise, he won't even know that you
have read his post; that is very rude and
inconsiderate.

# bitwise
254 & 15
==>14
# boolean
254 && 15
==>15

Only two things are untrue: nil and false.

puts "it's true" if 0
it's true
==>nil
puts "it's true" if 254 & 1
it's true
==>nil
puts "it's true" if 254 & 1 > 0
==>nil
 
N

Nobuyoshi Nakada

Hi,

At Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:19:01 +0900,
Peter Alvin wrote in [ruby-talk:316270]:
puts 1 & 1
and get 1
shouldn't I get true?

No. If it were, bit AND operation would be unavailable.
if session[:permissions] & Permissions::SomeMask ==
Permissions::SomeMask

if (session[:permissions] & Permissions::SomeMask).nonzero?
 
B

Brian Candler

Bottom line is this: What is Ruby idiom to test for bit mask? Is there
a more simple way to write:

if session[:permissions] & Permissions::SomeMask ==
Permissions::SomeMask
# user has permission to wash clothes, etc.
end

That's basically right - you can factor this out into your own method if
you do it a lot.

If you want to test for a single bit, there is Fixnum#[]

a = 14
a[0] # 0
a[1] # 1
a[2] # 1
a[3] # 1
a[4] # 0

You'd still have to test for a[2] == 1, since 0 and 1 are both true.

However you could use a different representation for your permissions,
such as a string containing a single letter for each permission granted.
Then:

if session[:permissions].include?("w")
# user has permission to wash clothes
end

or simply

if session[:permissions]["w"]
# user has permission to wash clothes
end
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,755
Messages
2,569,535
Members
45,007
Latest member
obedient dusk

Latest Threads

Top