Naming conventions

Discussion in 'Python' started by Uzair, Apr 22, 2004.

  1. Uzair

    Uzair Guest

    Why aren't the names of the modules in the standard library fixed so
    that they follow some actual naming convention? That is probably the
    biggest deterrent for new users -- having to dig through several
    sources to find the module they're interested in. And, as with urllib
    and urllib2, it isn't even clear at first glance which is more useful
    and when it should be used...

    Just curious...I've read a lot about the Python community's collective
    determination to maintain the purity of the language and ease-of-use,
    and their willingness to fix 'broken' elements rather than gloss over
    them in the name of backward compatibility, as Sun often does with
    Java :)

    Best,

    Uzair
     
    Uzair, Apr 22, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Uzair

    Paul Rubin Guest

    The usual convention with things like urllib/urllib2 is that someone
    writes urllib, people use it and gain experience with it, and learn
    that it would benefit from enhancements that would break existing code
    that uses it. So a new module gets implemented that has the
    enhancements but is incompatible with the old module. That way, new
    code can use the new module but old code can keep using the old
    module.
     
    Paul Rubin, Apr 22, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.