[OT] lcc-win32 and GNU

[jacob navia]

The easy way to stop this silliness is for Rose to identify her/him
self.

Mark McIntyre

 

[santosh]

Mark McIntyre

Are you jesting or are you serious? If the latter what's your reason for
this allegation?

 

[Mark McIntyre]

Mark McIntyre said:


Tell that to Richard Bos.

We're all entitled to one brainfart every so often... Even people
called Richard !

--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

 

[Mark McIntyre]

Are you jesting or are you serious? If the latter what's your reason for
this allegation?

I'd be interested to hear an explanation for this falsehood too. I
doubt we'll get one tho.
--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

 

[Keith Thompson]

Mark McIntyre

jacob, in a thread where accusations of lying and sockpuppetry are
being thrown around, adding to the flames is not helpful. If it's a
serious accusation, it's unfounded (or, if it isn't, please provide
evidence). If it's a joke, it's not funny.

 

[Keith Thompson]

<[email protected]> writes

[the usual crud]

From what I know of Richard Heathfield he can be an obtuse pedantic
pain in the arse (but not as bad as CBF but I believe him to be
honest and true to what he believes. He is consistent and stands by
what he says no mater how popular or unpopular.

I don't think it would even occur to him to use a fake id on here for
himself. If he wants to say something he does so under his own name.

I suggest that KM's accusations are not worthy of refutation. Please
don't feed the troll.

If you flame him, you're giving him *exactly* what he wants. If you
ignore him (use a killfile if you feel the need), he has no power.

 

[Doug]

jacob, in a thread where accusations of lying and sockpuppetry are
being thrown around, adding to the flames is not helpful. If it's a
serious accusation, it's unfounded (or, if it isn't, please provide
evidence). If it's a joke, it's not funny.

I'm afraid I found this very funny! (Mark - I'm pretty sure no
offense was intended.)

You're all getting your knickers in a twist for nothing. It's plainly
obvious RH would not use a 'sock puupet'. it's plainly obvious those
suggesting it are just fucking with you. Move along.

 

[jacob navia]

I'd be interested to hear an explanation for this falsehood too. I
doubt we'll get one tho.

When an anonymous stalker accused my daughter of being a thief,
you were the only one defending that post.

When the anonymous stalker started pleading a final solution for
the "jacob problem", you were the only one to support that post.

Your tone, insults etc fit well with what the anonymous posts
say.

You won. I do not post here anymore see?

 

[santosh]

When an anonymous stalker accused my daughter of being a thief,
you were the only one defending that post.

When the anonymous stalker started pleading a final solution for
the "jacob problem", you were the only one to support that post.

Your tone, insults etc fit well with what the anonymous posts
say.

You won. I do not post here anymore see?

This is exactly the type of baseless allegation that we don't want. And
don't get put off by anonymous cowards. Trolls are powerless when you
don't respond to them.

 

[Mark McIntyre]

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:49:15 +0530, in comp.lang.c , santosh

(nothing I've retained, but JN is in my killfile to avoid long
debatesd with him)

jacob navia wrote:

Thats a complete lie. I commented on the gratuitous insult you handed
out to Old Wolf, not on the criminal nature or otherwise of your
daughter. This can be trivially proven by reading the thread in google
groups.

Thats false too. Firstly there was no anonymous stalker, secondly
many people supported the idea of totally ignoring you - but curiously
I wasn't one of them (see post 90). I've since changed my mind by the
way.

Consider looking in the mirror.

--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

 

[Mark McIntyre]

I'm afraid I found this very funny! (Mark - I'm pretty sure no
offense was intended.)

I'm not. I have a view concerning JN's posts which I don't propose to
propagate, but which would lead me to suspect that comments such as
that are deadly serious.

You're all getting your knickers in a twist for nothing. It's plainly
obvious RH would not use a 'sock puupet'. it's plainly obvious those
suggesting it are just fucking with you. Move along.

Agreed. But then again, its a fairly serious allegation....
--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

 

[Keith Thompson]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:00:22 -0700, in comp.lang.c , Doug


Agreed. But then again, its a fairly serious allegation....

Indeed it is -- and Richard Bos *still* owes Richard Heathfield an
apology for accusing him of sockpuppetry.