ruby wiki options?

[dc]

hi list -

wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
wiki? there seem to be quite a few abandoned projects on rubyforge,
and the instiki site itself is basically out for the count.

any suggested progressing wiki projects?

tx,

/dc

--

 

[aidy]

any suggested progressing wiki projects?

the omnipotent Phlip can help you with that.

http://rubyforge.org/projects/minirubywiki/

he can help you with most things

aidy

 

[aidy]

hi list -

Phlip has a wiki

http://rubyforge.org/projects/minirubywiki/

aidy

 

[Phlip]

the omnipotent Phlip can help you with that.

http://rubyforge.org/projects/minirubywiki/

Thanks. And try Instiki, or a Rails-oriented Wiki.

My Wiki is "ambitious", which is a software engineering code-word for: "I
spend too much time adding cool features, and not enough time cleaning,
productizing, or extracting insects".

Its base features will work fine out-of-the box, and it has technical and
esthetic details that other Wikis often don't. The RemoteLink system, for
example, is just an example of how this Wiki lets you customize things
in-the-wiki, without resorting to scripts or excess markup.

 

[ramalho]

wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
wiki? [...]
any suggested progressing wiki projects?

Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:

http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show/RubyWikis

Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.

[1] http://wiki2go.nayima.be/

The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
RubyForge project has no activity and no files.

[2] http://wikis.onestepback.org/Ruse

I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.

Cheers,

Luciano

 

[zoat]

=> See ''Hiki'' which is a powerful and fast wiki clone written in
Ruby.
http://hikiwiki.org/en/

wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
wiki? [...]
any suggested progressing wiki projects?

Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:

http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show/RubyWikis

Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.

[1] http://wiki2go.nayima.be/

The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
RubyForge project has no activity and no files.

[2] http://wikis.onestepback.org/Ruse

I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.

Cheers,

Luciano

 

[zoat]

....see also this guideline using Instiki:
"How to host a personal wiki on your home computer" - Lifehacker
http://www.lifehacker.com/software/...ersonal-wiki-on-your-home-computer-126052.php

=> See ''Hiki'' which is a powerful and fast wiki clone written in
Ruby.
http://hikiwiki.org/en/

wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
wiki? [...]
any suggested progressing wiki projects?

Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:

http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show/RubyWikis

Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.

[1] http://wiki2go.nayima.be/

The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
RubyForge project has no activity and no files.

[2] http://wikis.onestepback.org/Ruse

I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.

Cheers,

Luciano

 

[Rob Sanheim]

wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
wiki? [...]
any suggested progressing wiki projects?

Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:

http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show/RubyWikis

Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.

[1] http://wiki2go.nayima.be/

The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
RubyForge project has no activity and no files.

[2] http://wikis.onestepback.org/Ruse

I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.

Cheers,

Luciano

The original maintainer of Instiki, Alexey, all but disappeared.
There was a user who took up a branch and merged some fixes and also
opened up a repository. Not sure what the status with that is,
though.

There is also i2, which is a super simple Rails wiki originally
written by DHH. Its behind the official Rails wiki, and I use it to
power the Madison Ruby wiki (http://www.madisonrails.com) with some
simple modifications and a captcha plugin I developed. I like it
because the code base is tiny and easy to change and hack. So the
fact that i2 is not properly maintained isn't that big of an issue, as
it "just works" if you need something simple.

I'm looking forward to Ruse being officially released, as well.

- Rob

 

[Lee Enricoso]

There is also i2, which is a super simple Rails wiki originally
written by DHH. Its behind the official Rails wiki, and I use it to
power the Madison Ruby wiki (http://www.madisonrails.com) with some
simple modifications and a captcha plugin I developed. I like it
because the code base is tiny and easy to change and hack. So the
fact that i2 is not properly maintained isn't that big of an issue, as
it "just works" if you need something simple.

I'm looking forward to Ruse being officially released, as well.

- Rob

Can you provide a link where I can download and evaluate the wiki engine
that you mention. I'm in the process of evaluating Wiki engines for my
pet project.

Thanks.

Lee