uses of robots.txt

Discussion in 'HTML' started by Math, Oct 6, 2007.

  1. Math

    Math Guest


    There is something I really don't understand ; and I would like your

    1. Some websites, (for instance contains a
    syndication feed (like

    2. Theses websites have a robots.txt file preventing some robots
    (declared by user-agents) from indexation.
    For example : contains (extract) :
    User-agent: *
    Disallow: /nwshp

    3. I've developped an syndication aggregator, and I woul'd like to
    respect these robots.txt files. but as I can see and understand, my
    user-agent isn't authorized to acces /nwshp?topic=po&output=atom
    because of this robots.txt...

    So, is it normal ? robots.txt files are only for indexation robots ?
    to sum up, my syndication aggregator should respect these files or
    not ?

    Math, Oct 6, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  2. Hi Math,
    It's hard to say, but if they prefer to keep this content from being
    copied to other sites, robots.txt is the way to do it. In other words,
    you can't assume they just want to keep indexing bots out, they might
    want to keep all bots out.

    If your aggregator is only being used by you and a few friends, then
    probably Google et al wouldn't care if your bot visits them once per
    hour or so. But if you want this aggregator to be used by lots of
    people, then I'd say you need to respect robots.txt.

    BTW the closest thing there is to a standard for robots.txt is here:

    When describing robots, it focuses on indexing bots. But it was written
    at a time when Web robots were less varied then they are now, so the
    author may not have considered your case.

    Good luck
    Nikita the Spider, Oct 7, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. Math

    Newsgroups Guest

    Thanks for your answers Nikita the Spider,

    Currently, yes ;-( but I developped it also for anybody who want to use
    it. :)
    The problem is : where is the limit between "few friends" and "lots of

    Yes, I agree. It's another debate, and I'm not used to reed rfc, so what
    mean "Expires June 4, 1997" on this rfc ? Mean that Comments are not
    considered after this date ? If not, I could comment this rfc. :)
    Newsgroups, Oct 7, 2007
  4. Math

    Ken Sims Guest

    I missed the original message because it was posted from Google
    Gropes, but my opinion is that *all* automated software should
    retrieve and respect robots.txt. I enforce it on my server by
    blocking the IP addresses of bad software at the router.
    Ken Sims, Oct 7, 2007
  5. That's where it gets tricky. =) But consider this -- if you obey
    robots.txt 100% from the start, you'll always be doing the right thing
    no matter how many people use your aggregator.
    That RFC was only a draft and it expired before it was approved.
    However, no other RFC governing the use of robots.txt has ever been
    approved or even written as far as I know, so that RFC is the closest
    thing we have to a official standard.
    Nikita the Spider, Oct 8, 2007
  6. Math

    Newsgroups Guest

    That's where it gets tricky. =) But consider this -- if you obey
    I agree ; but, If I obeyrobots.txt, my aggregator won't aggregate lots
    of RSS. Who want to use an aggregator which do not aggregate :)

    For information : There is currently about 70 users that use my
    aggregator... It's difficult for me to recruite :) But i really wants
    to be 100% conform with rules and standards...

    Thanks for your help and opinion.
    Newsgroups, Oct 8, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.