Using Opencores I2S master

[cbr_929rr]

I'm trying to use the Opencores I2S master logic as the driver for my
test platform.

The core came configured with SCK = 2.77 MHz and WS(left/right clock)=
69.44 KHz.


I would like to be able to reconfigure the core to generate SCK=3.07MHz

and WS=48 KHz.


I played around with the conf variable but could not get the ratio I'm
looking for.

Will read the documentation but an explanation would certainly help.


Thanks

 

[cbr_929rr]

According to the manual,
The sample rate is given by bit_rate/(RES * 2)

If I choose the sample rate to be 48 KHz, and the resolution is
20-bits,
the bit rate would be 1.92 Mbps.

However, the RATIO would then be calculated as follows.

RATIO= (wishbone_bus_clock - (sample_rate * RES * 8)) /
(sample_rate * RES * 4)

wishbone_bus_clock= 50 MHz
sample rate = 48 KHz
RES=20 bits

which would then be equal to ~22 (10110)
This is not giving me the values of 48KHz for WS and 3.072 MHz for
i2s_sck.
I am missing something and really need some help.

Thanks,
cbr

 

[Andy Peters]

I'm trying to use the Opencores I2S master logic as the driver for my
test platform.

Why do you need a special I2S core? It's not much more than a couple
of shift registers.

-a

 

[cbr_929rr]

I want to be able to generate close to real I2S transactions that we
will be having in real hardware.

Further, I would like to use Opencores since it is already proven to
work.

I would be thankful if I can get some help on how to re-configure the
core by referring to the configurable parameters in the example I've
mentioned previously.


I'm sure that there are atleast a few people in this group who have
used this core and know how it works.
It's just that I have not had any luck yet in finding the answer even
though I posted this question on comp.arch.fpga, vhdl, embedded and
even on opencores
forum/usenet groups.

Cbr.

 

[cbr_929rr]

I changed the conf ratio to "00001011", bypassed the WB_interface and
it started working.
The ACLK and LRCLK seemed to be what I expected. However, the SCLK was
not.
I used a FIFO to latch the data and read it out based on ACLK.

Thanks.

Cbr