what happened to RCR 65?

[gabriele renzi]

Hi gurus and nubys,

I was recently noticed of the existence of RCR65 that suggested
that the I/O functionality could be made in smaller piece instead of
the only IO monolith .

But it seems that the RCR somewhat disappeared, it's not been ported
to RCRchive.net, and rubygarden.org gives a blank page for it.

Yet, it can be retrieved via the Wayback Machine:
http://web.archive.org/web/20030608035701/http://www.rubygarden.org/article.php?sid=179
and it seem matz would have agreed with it, given a proper design.

It would be nice if the author could repost it,imo.

 

[David A. Black]

Hi --

Hi gurus and nubys,

I was recently noticed of the existence of RCR65 that suggested
that the I/O functionality could be made in smaller piece instead of
the only IO monolith .

But it seems that the RCR somewhat disappeared, it's not been ported
to RCRchive.net, and rubygarden.org gives a blank page for it.

It is actually on RCRchive, among the legacy rejected RCRs
(http://www.rcrchive.net/rgarchive/rejected.html#rcr65). (I haven't
read through all the discussion, so I'm not sure of the reason for
rejection or whether a modified version might be accepted.)


David

 

[Lothar Scholz]

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:42:42 +0900, "David A. Black"

This is the final sentence in the RCR65

 

[gabriele renzi]

It is actually on RCRchive, among the legacy rejected RCRs
(http://www.rcrchive.net/rgarchive/rejected.html#rcr65).

Oops. Sorry for the noise