Kenneth P. Turvey said:
Considering that Java is Turing complete, this just isn't really
meaningful at all.
I'll concede that it's nit-picking, but I don't think it's meaningless.
Precision is important in programming, and there is a distinct difference
between "it can't be done," and "it'll take some work to adapt an existing
servlet container to do it."
We should probably restrict the discussion to how things can be done in
Java with limited cost and effort, limiting ourselves to existing servlet
containers and APIs.
I've just reviewed the "what it's for" description that's posted here often,
and I don't see any such restriction.
Frankly, given the amount of pure drivel being posted in other threads, I
think that "we" would be happy to see someone actually talking about Java
at all...
sherm--