R
Richard Heathfield
av said:
,sdrawkcab daer ot elbissop si ti ,seY .elihw a rof ti yrT
?redrah ksat 'sredaer ruoy ekam yhW .tluciffid ylirassecennu si ti tub
If you learned to snip unnecessary context, there would be almost no text to
scroll.
But if ordinary common sense doesn't persuade you, let's try enlightened
self-interest. When you need help from people in this channel, would you
rather have the help of the bright people or the stupid people? The bright
people like to read stuff the right way up, and they like to see just
enough context to make sense, not pageloads of junk. And when a subscriber
writes upside down over and over and over again, many of the bright people
get sick and tired of it, and just ignore articles from that subscriber.
Top-posting is not a good strategy for those who need Usenet as a learning
resource.
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:58:58 GMT, ozbear wrote:
ON TOP-POSTING
so why is so wrong read in reverse order?
,sdrawkcab daer ot elbissop si ti ,seY .elihw a rof ti yrT
?redrah ksat 'sredaer ruoy ekam yhW .tluciffid ylirassecennu si ti tub
more near to the top more near to now, and the part much important is
in the top so i not have not scroll all text
If you learned to snip unnecessary context, there would be almost no text to
scroll.
But if ordinary common sense doesn't persuade you, let's try enlightened
self-interest. When you need help from people in this channel, would you
rather have the help of the bright people or the stupid people? The bright
people like to read stuff the right way up, and they like to see just
enough context to make sense, not pageloads of junk. And when a subscriber
writes upside down over and over and over again, many of the bright people
get sick and tired of it, and just ignore articles from that subscriber.
Top-posting is not a good strategy for those who need Usenet as a learning
resource.