XML Question

[Jay (49)]

I have a document as follows:

<graphics>
<graphic>
<tag>
<parameter/>
</tag>
<tag>
<parameter/>
</tag>
</graphic>
</graphics>

I want to add another child node called hyperlinks to the parent graphic. Does the following make sense? Can the children of graphic have two different node names. I know it is well formed, but does it make sense?

<graphics>
<graphic>
<tags>
<tag>
<parameter />
</tag>
<tag>
<parameter />
</tag>
</tags>
<hyperlinks>
<href />
</hyperlinks>
</graphic>
</graphics>

 

[cr88192]

I have a document as follows:

<graphics>
<graphic>
<tag>
<parameter/>
</tag>
<tag>
<parameter/>
</tag>
</graphic>
</graphics>

I want to add another child node called hyperlinks to the parent graphic. Does the following make sense? Can the children of graphic have two different node names. I know it is well formed, but does it make sense?

<graphics>
<graphic>
<tags>
<tag>
<parameter />
</tag>
<tag>
<parameter />
</tag>
</tags>
<hyperlinks>
<href />
</hyperlinks>
</graphic>
</graphics>

I think this would depend on the app.

imo, this change would seem "signifigant", less so would be a more minor change:
<graphics>
<graphic>
<tag>
<parameter/>
</tag>
<tag>
<parameter/>
</tag>
<hyperlinks>
<href />
</hyperlinks>
</graphic>
</graphics>

but, still, this depends on the app.

if you are writing your own app, then likely you are free to choose.

I personally like it when the means by which to add new tags and the behavior of unknown tags and such are well defined.

 

[Jay (49)]

thats the way i had it on my first attempts. But it didn't look correct. A parent has several children with the same <tag> with their own children and then another child with a different tag <hyperlinks> with their children. So I'm take that you agree that does make sense.

I guess the analogy would be a parent has children and then has step children.

 

[Jay (49)]

How would I modify this DTD to reflect this new child being added to the way you have suggested.

Thank You!

strXML = "<?xml version='1.0' ?>"
strXML = strXML & "<!DOCTYPE graphics ["
strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT graphics (graphic*)>"
strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT graphic (tag*)>"
strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST graphic id ID #REQUIRED>"
strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST graphic name CDATA #IMPLIED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT tag (parameter*)>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST tag id ID #REQUIRED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST tag name CDATA #IMPLIED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT parameter EMPTY>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST parameter id ID #REQUIRED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST parameter name CDATA #IMPLIED>]>" strXML = strXML & "<graphics/> " & vbCrLf

 

[cr88192]

thats the way i had it on my first attempts. But it didn't look correct. A parent has several children with the same <tag> with their own children and then another child with a different tag <hyperlinks> with their children. So I'm take that you agree that does make sense.

I guess the analogy would be a parent has children and then has step children.

well, imo, it depends. a lot has to do with what apps expect to be done in that case, how they might treat unknown tags, ... the app designer is free to choose.

so, this question can't really be answered in a "general" sense afaik.

 

[cr88192]

How would I modify this DTD to reflect this new child being added to the way you have suggested.

Thank You!

strXML = "<?xml version='1.0' ?>"
strXML = strXML & "<!DOCTYPE graphics ["
strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT graphics (graphic*)>"
strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT graphic (tag*)>"
strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST graphic id ID #REQUIRED>"
strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST graphic name CDATA #IMPLIED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT tag (parameter*)>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST tag id ID #REQUIRED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST tag name CDATA #IMPLIED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ELEMENT parameter EMPTY>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST parameter id ID #REQUIRED>" strXML = strXML & "<!ATTLIST parameter name CDATA #IMPLIED>]>" strXML = strXML & "<graphics/> " & vbCrLf

err, dunno. I don't really use nor am I really fammiliar with dtd's (nor am I that fammiliar with vb for that matter...).