Does this page work in your Firefox?

B

Blinky the Shark

Mika said:
Hi all, if you could kindly test this W3C validated page specifically
in Firefox only and advise if you see the streetscape appear.
(Designed for broadband):

http://tinyurl.com/35mwxr

Since you've been complaining of discussion beyond answers to your
specific questions: I do not see it.
 
M

Mika

Blinky the Shark said:
Since you've been complaining of discussion beyond answers to your
specific questions: I do not see it.

Have only complained about people assuming we haven't thought of very
obvious things like being sued by shops for giving them free advertsing when
we asked about an IE error message.

Will not complain however if you are able to elaborate. The page should
load, and on Broadband in 2-3 seconds you should see a streetscape appear in
the blue central box, which you can then walk along.

If you don't, what version FF are you on, and do you have JS enabled?

A screenshot would be fantastic.

Constructive replies always welcomed.

Mika
 
J

John Hosking

Mika said:
Hi all, if you could kindly test this W3C validated page

This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Result: Failed validation, 14 Errors
specifically in Firefox only and advise if you see the
streetscape appear. (Designed for broadband):

http://tinyurl.com/35mwxr

No, without JS, I don't. With JS I do. I hear the crashing waves either way.
 
A

Andy Dingley


Possibly the nastiest page in many a long day.

I don't see anything. After 20 seconds of fast broadband (slow old
laptop though) I gave up. I had to kill FF to do so.

What I did see looks like a domain-squatter's spam page.

"Quicker then driving" You don't really get this "web" thing, do you?
 
M

Mika

John Hosking said:
This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Result: Failed validation, 14 Errors

When are you checking this? A few days ago perhaps, but as of yesterday,
and 5 seconds ago when we checked again, we get this result:

http://tinyurl.com/39sxo5
W3C CSS Validator Results
Congratulations! No Error Found.
This document validates as CSS!
To show your readers that you've taken the care to create an interoperable
Web page, you may display this icon on any page that validates. Here is the
XHTML you could use to add this icon to your Web page:

Are you saying the W3C are wrong or did you just not check it when we posted
this post? We are trying to work on the feedback from this group, and the
site is constantly being cleaned and improved based on your advice.
No, without JS, I don't. With JS I do. I hear the crashing waves either
way.

Very funny. It seems people on this group are not able to hear truck
engines or crowd noise, and can only hear passing cars as waves. We know
what you mean, but come on we all know what the sound is really. Depends
how you see the half full glass.

Glad to know it works for you with JS which is how all FF browsers are
installed as standard.
 
M

Mika

Andy Dingley said:
Possibly the nastiest page in many a long day.

Thanks. That explains all the great reviews posted on our home page. We
appreciate it isn't how you would do it, but it is at least unique and
inventive.
I don't see anything. After 20 seconds of fast broadband (slow old
laptop though) I gave up. I had to kill FF to do so.

May we ask please:

Do you have JS enabled?
What speed broadband is it?
A 'slow old' laptop might not help however.

What I did see looks like a domain-squatter's spam page.

Thanks. Here is a rough example of what you might see, which really
doesn't:
http://www.superhighstreet.com/images/OxfordCircus.jpg
"Quicker then driving" You don't really get this "web" thing, do you?

We know how to be nice and are doing our best.
 
B

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

Mika said:
...........................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


When are you checking this? A few days ago perhaps, but as of
yesterday, and 5 seconds ago when we checked again, we get this
result: <snip>

Are you saying the W3C are wrong

No, he is saying you forgot the HTML validation, which is what most of
us think of when you say "W3C validated page." Otherwise, you would have
mentioned "CSS validates" or similar.
Glad to know it works for you with JS which is how all FF browsers are
installed as standard.

...though many people turn it off because it is the prime cause of popup
windows, cookie delivery, and other annoyances. It is also stripped by
many corporate firewalls.
 
J

J.O. Aho

Mika said:
Hi all, if you could kindly test this W3C validated page specifically in
Firefox only and advise if you see the streetscape appear. (Designed for
broadband):

http://tinyurl.com/35mwxr

Seems to work in SeaMonkey if JS turned on, but then the page wants to be on
top when opening things like preferences or editing bookmarks.

Scrolling how the JS generated part of the page has trouble to follow with the
rest of the page, I guess my old 2GHz CPU starts to be too slow to surf the
net, while gaming it's quite good suited for.
 
M

Mika

Beauregard T. Shagnasty said:
Mika wrote:


No, he is saying you forgot the HTML validation, which is what most of
us think of when you say "W3C validated page." Otherwise, you would have
mentioned "CSS validates" or similar.

Of the 14 'errors':

1 is caused by MS Expression Web and cannot be changed (without severe
rewrites)
1 is valid 'onbeforeunload' but we are welcome to hear suggested
alternatives?
8 are caused by one small Flash object - causes no actual issues
2 we have just fixed (table size)
1 is to open a link in a new window - has to happen, we are open to
suggestions?
1 is required to get around the IE/Google API bug (JS must be outside the
body tag)

In other words, the page works perfectly on all test systems, and 12/14
above are by design.

What is the actual real life disadvantage of leaving these in, in reality?
I mean, the site works everywhere we can test it. Nobody knows there are
these few minor things except us.
..though many people turn it off because it is the prime cause of popup
windows, cookie delivery, and other annoyances. It is also stripped by
many corporate firewalls.

That is up to them - no other way to use Google Maps sadly.
 
M

Mika

J.O. Aho said:
Seems to work in SeaMonkey if JS turned on, but then the page wants to be
on
top when opening things like preferences or editing bookmarks.

Scrolling how the JS generated part of the page has trouble to follow with
the
rest of the page, I guess my old 2GHz CPU starts to be too slow to surf
the
net, while gaming it's quite good suited for.

Thanks for the feedback.
 
S

Sherman Pendley

Mika said:
Thanks. That explains all the great reviews posted on our home page. We
appreciate it isn't how you would do it, but it is at least unique and
inventive.

Speaking as a customer, I'm not looking for "unique and inventive" web
design when I'm doing my online shopping. I'm a web geek, and I'm not
against such things in general. I enjoy many entertainment, music, comics
and "concept" sites that are loaded with stuff like that - indeed, being
entertained by a unique and inventive design is sometimes the point of an
entire site.

But the point of a shopping site is different. A shopping site should be
concerned with making it as easy as possible for the customer to find what
they want and spend their money. The goal of *your* shopping site appears
to be just the opposite, to make it as difficult as possible.

So tell me - as a customer, what motivation do I have to enable VirusScript,
wait for minutes for each of your pages to load, and turn off my preferred
music, just for the privilege of shopping at your site? Why shouldn't I just
go to Amazon.com instead, which loads quickly, works without VirusScript,
and remains blissfully silent?

sherm--
 
B

Bone Ur

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:23:05
GMT Sherman Pendley scribed:
So tell me - as a customer, what motivation do I have to enable
VirusScript, wait for minutes for each of your pages to load, and turn
off my preferred music, just for the privilege of shopping at your
site? Why shouldn't I just go to Amazon.com instead, which loads
quickly, works without VirusScript, and remains blissfully silent?

Good point - regardless of any connotations to the OP's site. This past
year, I've spent over $1,000.00 at amazon.com, and except for one special
company-owned-and-operated site, I've done no other online purchasing. I
like amazon.com because it functions correctly and facilely, it's fast, and
it's decently efficient. When I wish to buy something, the last thing I
want to do is ditz around.
 
M

Mika

Sherman Pendley said:
Speaking as a customer, I'm not looking for "unique and inventive" web
design when I'm doing my online shopping. I'm a web geek, and I'm not
against such things in general. I enjoy many entertainment, music, comics
and "concept" sites that are loaded with stuff like that - indeed, being
entertained by a unique and inventive design is sometimes the point of an
entire site.

But the point of a shopping site is different. A shopping site should be
concerned with making it as easy as possible for the customer to find what
they want and spend their money. The goal of *your* shopping site appears
to be just the opposite, to make it as difficult as possible.

So tell me - as a customer, what motivation do I have to enable
VirusScript,
wait for minutes for each of your pages to load, and turn off my preferred
music, just for the privilege of shopping at your site? Why shouldn't I
just
go to Amazon.com instead, which loads quickly, works without VirusScript,
and remains blissfully silent?

To answer your question:

Don't you find search engines rather clinical? All that text doesn't
exactly stimulate the senses. We believe Internet shopping should be a rich
user experience, and that is what we deliver -- the sights & sounds of real
world shopping, minus the hassle.

Trawling the search engines you'll eventually find many retailers don't have
an online store -- just a catalogue, or nothing at all. But when you click
their door on the Superhighstreet, you're virtually always taken to an
online outlet that does allow home delivery of the same products. We've
done the painstaking research for you, to take you straight to identical
brands & products available online. No more trawling the web then.

Many people prefer that real street experience. There are streets we know
and love, and we know where their favourite shops are and how they look.
With us you can still go there, without the heavy bags & traffic jams of
course.

Better still, there are millions of people who may never get the chance to
stroll down the famous streets we feature. Now they can scroll down them
almost instantly, travelling 100s of miles in seconds.

(And if you can't see the big speaker button to turn the sound off that's
right above the streetscape, maybe you need to visit the opticians on Oxford
Street ;) )
 
C

Chris F.A. Johnson

To answer your question:

Don't you find search engines rather clinical?

No.
All that text doesn't exactly stimulate the senses.

Why would I expect (or want) sensual stimulation from a search
engine?
We believe Internet shopping should be a rich user experience, and
that is what we deliver -- the sights & sounds of real world
shopping, minus the hassle.

Luckily, I didn't hear any sound on your site; if I had, the URL would
very quickly be redirected to 0.0.0.0.

....
(And if you can't see the big speaker button to turn the sound off that's
right above the streetscape, maybe you need to visit the opticians on Oxford
Street ;) )

There is no speaker button ... oh, it's in the flash ... [turn on
flash] ... That's big? You must be using a very low resolution
screen!
 
S

Sherman Pendley

Mika said:
To answer your question:

Don't you find search engines rather clinical? All that text doesn't
exactly stimulate the senses.

I don't expect a search engine to "stimulate the senses" - I expect it to
quickly return accessible and relevant results. IMHO, Google is a success
because of its clean interface, not in spite of it.
We believe Internet shopping should be a rich
user experience, and that is what we deliver -- the sights & sounds of real
world shopping, minus the hassle.

But I don't *want* the sights and sounds of real-world shopping. That's why
I'm shopping on the internet to begin with.

Besides which, your site may not have the same hassle as real-world shopping
(no crowds, for one thing) but it's definitely not hassle-free. I have to
enable VirusScript, I have to wait for far too long, I have to figure out how
to turn off the noise it makes, etc.

Your stores may well have goods and services that make it a worthwhile trade-
off. The problem is, I have to make that trade blindly; I have to fulfill all
of your requirements before I can even look at the stores to see if what they
have is worth doing so.
Many people prefer that real street experience. There are streets we know
and love, and we know where their favourite shops are and how they look.
With us you can still go there, without the heavy bags & traffic jams of
course.

Better still, there are millions of people who may never get the chance to
stroll down the famous streets we feature. Now they can scroll down them
almost instantly, travelling 100s of miles in seconds.

That reads like an "information superhighway" marketing spiel from the mid
90s, back when web developers still thought that online shoppers were as
enamored with bells and whistles as the developers themselves were.

The bottom line for me is this: I've seen many friends and relatives hit
the "back" button because a shopping site was too slow to load, it made
noise, it didn't work with their preferred browser settings, etc. I've yet
to see *anyone* leave such a site because it loaded too quickly, was too
easy to use, or didn't play any background music.

sherm--
 
M

Mika

(And if you can't see the big speaker button to turn the sound off that's
right above the streetscape, maybe you need to visit the opticians on
Oxford
Street ;) )

There is no speaker button ... oh, it's in the flash ... [turn on
flash] ... That's big? You must be using a very low resolution
screen!

Wow you guys love to be picky don't you. It's actually quite amusing! ;)
Might come here more just for the sheer entertainment at watching you all at
play.

If you can't see the flash button because you have flash turned off then you
don't need to see the button as you won't hear the sound anyway. Geesh!

We get that you don't like our site. You can't please all the people all
time, so live and let live. Over and out.

Mika
 
M

Mika

I don't expect a search engine to "stimulate the senses" - I expect it to
quickly return accessible and relevant results. IMHO, Google is a success
because of its clean interface, not in spite of it.

I did not say that Google is not a success or that we are a search engine,
however MANY people PREFER going shopping on REAL streets, compared to using
Google or Amazon.

That is the market niche we are approaching.

If you have not been able to digest and understand that concept by now and
say something remotely accepting of the principle, then we are sorry you
never will.
But I don't *want* the sights and sounds of real-world shopping. That's
why
I'm shopping on the internet to begin with.

And you are an individual who many disagree with. It is not aimed at you,
someone who likes Internet shopping. It is aimed at those who DON'T, and
who love real streets because of what they see, and what they HEAR. Your
advice is, make it simpler, turn the sound off.

You have missed the point quite outstandingly.
Besides which, your site may not have the same hassle as real-world
shopping
(no crowds, for one thing) but it's definitely not hassle-free. I have to
enable VirusScript, I have to wait for far too long, I have to figure out
how
to turn off the noise it makes, etc.

I think we can safely say that this site is not aimed at the sort of people
who generally spent their time arguing in web coding newsgroups, or who even
know how to disable JS.

JS never hurt anyone with a decent virus checker, unless they tend to
frequent undesirable websites I guess.
Your stores may well have goods and services that make it a worthwhile
trade-
off.

Thank you! At last a semi-positive comment. Uh-oh now I've said that
you'll want to take it back or correct me! ;)
The problem is, I have to make that trade blindly; I have to fulfill all
of your requirements before I can even look at the stores to see if what
they
have is worth doing so.

Trust me you don't have to, just move along and try Google. That's what
you're happy with which is fair enough.
The bottom line for me is this: I've seen many friends and relatives hit
the "back" button because a shopping site was too slow to load, it made
noise, it didn't work with their preferred browser settings, etc. I've yet
to see *anyone* leave such a site because it loaded too quickly, was too
easy to use, or didn't play any background music.

Our repeat visitor hit count would disagree with you. Some people even just
use our site to see where a shop they want to visit is on a street, before
they visit the street itself. But if they're with us and make an unexpected
purchase which some do, then that's great too.

I think you guys could benefit a lot from loosening up, learning that not
everyone thinks like a programmer, that everyone is different, to live and
let live, and realise how good it feels to say something nice to someone,
even if you don't share their beliefs.

The frankly incredibly offensive behaviour we have witnessed here is enough
to make us stay away for life. Any good advice given by *some* of you was
completely undone by the disgusting manner in which you speak.

As for the others, thanks again for the constructive feedback. The site is
now better for it.

Over and out.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,581
Members
45,056
Latest member
GlycogenSupporthealth

Latest Threads

Top